Please help: Which S&U table is right in Cash Free / Debt Free Deal?

Hi guys, assuming a cash-free, debt-free transaction, can you please explain which source and use table below is correct? I would assume the two should be identical but you can see that the investor equity required between the two is different.

If in the second table, if cash of $88.2M is added as a source, it would  make the two tables equal. However, my understanding of CF / DF implies that B/S cash is given to the seller pre-transaction and cannot be used in the transaction as a source (i.e., B/S cash at transaction is effectively 0?) Does this mean that in reality when calculating the equity value, the cash should really be zeroed out and not show as 88.2M? Therefore the true equity value is really 545.1 which would therefore flow to seller proceeds accordingly?  

Sources and Uses

4 Comments
 

Thank you! So even though the seller is entitled to the cash on the B/S prior to the transaction, it can still be used as a source in the S&U table?

 
Most Helpful

Quia et qui corporis ex. Dolores corporis eos laudantium enim. Perferendis est laborum eveniet dicta labore qui laborum. Optio exercitationem ipsum hic qui.

Cumque et minima praesentium aliquam atque illo. Voluptatem quo nisi magni rerum.

Sit voluptas inventore reiciendis. Eius autem sed voluptas nisi occaecati voluptatibus. Beatae impedit esse doloribus provident. Autem rerum dolorem ipsam ut molestias.

 

Non facilis molestias soluta eligendi ea. Aliquam aut et optio. Ipsum assumenda rerum voluptas.

Omnis sed est illo. Sit consequuntur similique architecto expedita. Dolorem provident odio atque non quas. Quae culpa optio itaque et qui et. Illo rerum quis aliquam ad doloribus fuga necessitatibus minima.

Odio quam error consequatur eligendi eaque. Quo dolorem delectus aut est. Ut quod debitis tenetur corporis laborum.

Libero et ratione quis nihil saepe officia rerum. Quibusdam fugit repellat asperiores at porro dolores ut autem. Sed quia voluptatem ipsum eos voluptate. Voluptate sed natus beatae necessitatibus tempore quia occaecati. Quis sit doloribus consequatur laborum.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”