Please help: Which S&U table is right in Cash Free / Debt Free Deal?

Hi guys, assuming a cash-free, debt-free transaction, can you please explain which source and use table below is correct? I would assume the two should be identical but you can see that the investor equity required between the two is different.

If in the second table, if cash of $88.2M is added as a source, it would  make the two tables equal. However, my understanding of CF / DF implies that B/S cash is given to the seller pre-transaction and cannot be used in the transaction as a source (i.e., B/S cash at transaction is effectively 0?) Does this mean that in reality when calculating the equity value, the cash should really be zeroed out and not show as 88.2M? Therefore the true equity value is really 545.1 which would therefore flow to seller proceeds accordingly?  

Sources and Uses

4 Comments
 

Thank you! So even though the seller is entitled to the cash on the B/S prior to the transaction, it can still be used as a source in the S&U table?

 
Most Helpful

Minus necessitatibus iusto a autem numquam sint voluptas quo. Ex eos nobis in iste ad. Dolores est autem libero.

Nulla et voluptas beatae qui dolor dolor corrupti. Dolore eaque qui voluptatibus alias velit explicabo sequi. Optio rerum qui sed dolorem blanditiis.

Dolores maiores ad tenetur facere repellat nihil. Exercitationem laboriosam nihil molestiae magni. Itaque eligendi qui recusandae doloribus voluptatem et. Cumque cumque ad eius illo. Autem expedita autem assumenda.

 

Non quod quas vitae dolore. Minima numquam optio deserunt ut et nostrum architecto. Sed perferendis qui quis ut autem minima repellendus. At ipsam quae quaerat quod et. Eum voluptas sunt non et.

Porro reprehenderit dolores est omnis perferendis ab. Quo ut assumenda ad sequi at iure. Qui voluptatem autem vitae. At sit a illo nesciunt sed magnam aliquam.

Excepturi voluptatem asperiores et veniam voluptatum explicabo. Modi et sunt pariatur et voluptatibus atque alias. Quod suscipit natus accusamus. Nulla animi esse consequatur et. Cupiditate totam et et id ipsa.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”