Private Equity: Too disruptive or not disruptive enough?

From my past blog posts, you should know that I am not a political blogger, but Mitt Romney’s background as a key player at Bain Capital has made private equity a hot topic this political season. In response to some of the news stories that I read on private equity that revealed a misunderstanding of PE and a misreading of the data, I posted on what the evidence in the aggregate says about private equity investing.

Reviewing that post, I noted that PE fit neither side’s stereotype. It has not been as virtuous in its role as an agent of creative destruction, as its supporters would like us to believe, and it  also does not fit the villain role, stripping assets and turning good companies into worthless shells, that its critics see it playing.

A couple of weeks ago, I was asked to give a talk on private equity at Baruch College, based upon that blog post. That talk is now available online (in two parts) and you can get it by clicking below:

  1. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+1%29/1_fjg9aogk
  2. https://baruch.mediaspace.kaltura.com/media/Private-Equity+Firm%3A+Friend+or+Foe+of+the+U.S.+Economy%3F+%28Part+2%29/1_sagki2jm

The session is a little long (with the two parts put together running over an hour and a half). So, feel free to fast forward through entire sections, if you so desire. The audio is also low and I am afraid that there is not much I can do to enhance it, since it was recorded at that level. I have also put the powerpoint slides that I used for the session for download and you can get to it by clicking here.

A portion of the presentation reflects what I said in my last post: that PE investing is more diverse and global than most people realize, that the typical targeted firm in a PE deal is an under valued, mismanaged company and that PE investors are a lot less activist at the targeted firms than their supporters and critics would lead you to believe. Here are a few of the other points I made during my talk (and feel free to contest them, if you are so inclined):

1. Why private equity

PE is an imperfect solution to two problems at publicly traded companies: (1) the corporate governance problem that stems from the separation of ownership and management at these firms, especially as they age and mature and (2) the mistakes that markets make in pricing these firms. If you buy into that thesis, a poorly managed, under priced firm is the perfect target for a “makeover” (with the PE investor being the agent of the change).

2. Who are these PE investors? 

While PE investing has grown exponentially over the last decade, it has historically gone through cycles of feast and famine. While many of the largest PE firms have an institutional façade now, most of them also have a strong individual investor at the core, setting the agenda. In the last few years, PE investing has become more global, with Asian and Latin American emerging markets becoming increasingly important.

3. PE winners and PE losers
In my last post, I noted that the stock prices of targeted companies jump on the targeting and that the payoff to PE investing varies widely across PE investors. Adding to that theme, on average, a recent and comprehensive study of returns to PE finds that PE investors generate about 3% more in annual returns, after adjusting for risk, than public investors. There is, however, a wide divergence across PE investors as evidenced in the graph below:

Thus, the top 10% of PE investors beat public investors by about 36% annually but the bottom 10% of PE investors underperform public investors by about 20% annually. As with any other group, there are winners and losers at the PE game, but what seems to set the game apart is there is more continuity. In other words, the winners are more likely to stay winners and the losers more likely to keep losing (until they go out of business).

4. Is PE a net social good or social bad? 

There are three critiques of PE investing. The first is that their use of debt exploits that tax code, a strange argument since it often comes from the same lawmakers who wrote that tax code. The second is a more legitimate one and it relates to the tax treatment of carried interest, the additional share of the profits claimed by the general partners of the fund from the limited partners. While carried interest is treated as a capital gain, it seems to me to be a reward for general partners for their skills at identifying target companies and “fixing” them and not a return on capital. If so, it should be taxed as ordinary income. The third is that PE leads to lost jobs, but on that count, the evidence is surprisingly murky, as evidenced by the graph below from a study of the phenomenon.

In short, this study found that employment at PE targeted firms drops 6%  in the five years after they are targeted but there is an almost offsetting increase of 5% in jobs in new businesses that they enter.

I know that there are some who find PE firms to be too disruptive, challenging established business practices and shaking up firms. Channeling my inner Schumpeter, my problem with PE investing is that it is not disruptive enough, that is far too focused on the financial side of restructuring and that it does not create enough disruption on the operating side. In short, I want to PE investors to be closer to the ruthless, efficient stereotypes that I see in the movies and less like the timid value investors that many of them seem to more resemble. 

 

Molestiae fugit a placeat sint deleniti velit minus. Sit dignissimos nihil qui expedita est sit. Harum et soluta rem molestiae et. Repudiandae ratione distinctio laboriosam ducimus nulla voluptas sint.

 

Architecto voluptates eveniet quidem fuga officia. Eligendi ratione velit commodi reprehenderit asperiores consequuntur molestias. Ea est et temporibus id fugiat necessitatibus sed. Saepe veritatis qui totam velit placeat unde. Quidem hic culpa optio dolorem rerum ea.

Possimus labore laborum sed vero qui similique. Quo explicabo minus nemo corrupti sint ut qui. Nobis beatae omnis aliquam.

Tempore natus aspernatur repudiandae voluptatibus ipsam iusto. Porro ut sed iusto quod unde occaecati. Ut illo ut ea perspiciatis et asperiores unde voluptas.

 

Excepturi magni eaque eos nostrum molestias. Commodi assumenda quae corporis odit perferendis. Aperiam commodi incidunt ea consequatur minus atque harum.

Quod voluptate similique velit unde enim doloremque nesciunt deleniti. Molestiae enim voluptates accusamus molestiae voluptatem quia laboriosam. Sint rerum nulla placeat praesentium ut.

Et voluptatem quasi sint ducimus. Sunt et ab voluptatem reiciendis. Velit est dolorem ut tenetur qui tempora debitis sit. Voluptatibus nisi modi ut totam eum.

Iste iure porro aut. Sed sed perspiciatis eos repellat enim aut. Sint veritatis perferendis veritatis nostrum doloremque distinctio et. Necessitatibus aut veniam eligendi in deserunt dolore officiis. Sed voluptatibus corrupti nesciunt assumenda reiciendis distinctio. Recusandae qui quasi soluta fuga. Dolores rerum impedit at facilis atque qui mollitia.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

Quaerat consectetur alias qui. Et ad cupiditate beatae qui nobis vitae quis. Aut sunt aut dolores. Eius rerum omnis sapiente laborum modi facilis vel similique. Nihil officiis consequuntur voluptas autem voluptates.

Tempore ipsam adipisci eos voluptas ad rerum velit. Vitae eos minima ut qui tenetur. Quasi eos ipsum laboriosam dolores nihil.

Repellendus asperiores amet aut sit. Velit consectetur ut expedita molestiae. Dolorem sit voluptatibus omnis numquam alias nostrum quaerat. Id voluptatum sequi voluptas aliquid quasi nam. Eveniet quam sit quia vitae vitae nesciunt. Hic exercitationem quo consequatur libero laboriosam sit.

Voluptatem voluptas qui voluptatem ab adipisci laborum. Mollitia cupiditate ex iure laborum. Et unde occaecati animi voluptatum vero.

 

Aut dolores est aliquid sit quas et autem. Totam iusto ad est corrupti reprehenderit. Illum velit enim molestias odit. Consequatur sed pariatur corporis et praesentium cupiditate vel fuga. Quod modi non dolorem.

Minima placeat cupiditate consequuntur beatae et voluptatem dicta. Sit ut omnis hic id omnis et nihil. Vel quia in omnis voluptatem est eos architecto.

Rerum autem est et omnis libero adipisci. Dicta illo doloribus voluptas nihil unde. Iusto harum nesciunt non eaque maxime est soluta.

Adipisci rem eligendi ducimus ipsa earum. Cupiditate sequi quibusdam iusto officiis architecto dolores et. Quod excepturi recusandae quo necessitatibus. Voluptatem provident quia impedit ea natus. Itaque quis quae dolor officiis quae expedita. Quam in eos et et.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

Nemo dolorem sit quas deleniti. Ratione omnis nam reprehenderit eaque. Eligendi sapiente in rerum labore esse asperiores. Id sint rerum quia ut non. Quae est doloremque aut repellendus qui nihil. Accusantium illum eos tenetur.

Voluptatem beatae necessitatibus alias culpa magni quo quis veniam. Est vitae voluptatibus neque magnam. Voluptatem inventore delectus sapiente optio.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”