Question on management options in LBO
I have a question about management options in LBO and which method is correct - I have gone through historical posts in this form, but am still confused. Let's say we have entry equity of $100, management incentive option pool of 10% (post exit), and exit equity of $200. Let's assume this means that we have 100 shares initially at $1 per share. At exit, this would mean each share is now worth $2. An incentive option pool of 10% means that there are new 11.111... new shares created from the option pool. I thought that both option A and Option B should produce the same figure but they are slightly different and I want to understand why and which one is technically correct
OPTION A: Backdoor TSM Method - Sponsor Equity at Exit = (200 - 100) * 10% = $190
OPTION B:
- Exit Total Equity = $200
- Add back cash from exercise of the 11.111... new options at original price of $1/share: +$11.11
- Subtract dilution from 11.111... new options at new strike price of $2/share: -$22.22
- Sponsor exit at equity is $188.88... (which is different than the $190)
- Add back cash from exercise of the 11.111... new options at original price of $1/share: +$11.11
Option B produces $190 as well.
Post-exercise equity value is $211.111
Sponsor owns 90% post MIP dilution - definitionally the MIP pool is 10%
$211.111 * 90% = $190
By the way... depends on the deal but generally when we issue MIP for "10% of the equity" its 10% of the initial sponsor equity size so when you do the full math it's actually slightly less than 10%.
Thank you! What is the math if the MIP is based on the initial ownership?
Tossing out another way to think about it - flow the proceeds waterfall:
This is only assuming that the option pool is awarded as a percentage of ending equity though, most of the time it is awarded as a percentage of the beginning equity, and in that case, how would it work?
This actually does assume issuance as % of beginning equity. In my example, the sponsor owns the preferred shares (e.g., Security A) while the management team gets common shares (e.g., Security B). If we assume 1 share = $1, Security A will have 100M shares that are all owned by the sponsor. It's typically structured so Security B shares will be 100M shares (where each A gets an equivalent B share) plus shares for management where management will own 10% of Security B on a fully-diluted basis (i.e., (100M / 90%) - 100M = 11.1M shares).
That makes sense! But what does the other person who commented mean when they say that incentive plan is issued for beginning equity so that it’s slightly less than 10%? Because in our case we have management being awarded $10 out of $200 pre diluted value and out of $211.11 fully diluted basis. So it would be 5% options on a pre diluted basis and 10% on a diluted basis? Where does slightly less than 10% come in?
I actually didn’t follow their comment. Maybe they’re trying to say if check is $100M and you offer management $10M (10% of that figure), they’d own 10/110 which is like 9%?? I’ve just never seen the 10% derived that way. It’s supposed to be on fully diluted shares in some class (based on what I’ve been taught).
Laboriosam veniam sit animi assumenda consequatur repudiandae. Harum ab aperiam adipisci soluta perferendis qui rem. Et voluptas explicabo voluptas illum excepturi cum et. Neque non consequatur sed hic. Corrupti dolore voluptatibus nemo reprehenderit cupiditate ut. Quos ea eum est ut quae similique impedit molestiae. Ab voluptates et unde rerum. Eum deserunt ut et voluptatem repellat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...