Quitting PE for entrepreneurship

Hi,

Looking for opinions on my current situation.
I did 2 years of M&A at a BB/EB, then joined my current small/mid-cap PE fund (with a sector focus not close to my interests), where I have been less than a year now.

Joined the PE fund due to being somewhat interested in it but mostly to get out of IB, which was not for me at all.

I do not enjoy my work at the fund at all, and don't see myself staying in PE for a long time. My end goal has always been to become an entrepreneur, and now it seems I have the lucky position to be able to get financing for an acquisition of a small company (ca 1-3 million pounds EV range).

Here lies the problem:
I want to focus on the search process full-time, but this would require me to quit my current job, and the search could take up to a few years.
Staying at my current job however, does not lend me enough spare time to do this properly. Hours are not IB but not too far from them.

Is it completely foolish to quit my current job and pursue my goal? Or should one stay in this miserable limbo and hope that an opportunity presents itself magically down the line.

Cheers

 
jameson_903:
I do not enjoy my work at the fund at all

My end goal has always been to become an entrepreneur

I have the lucky position to be able to get financing

I want to focus on the search process full-time

Staying at my current job however, does not lend me enough spare time to do this properly.

Hard for this to be much clearer. Unless you're living paycheck to paycheck and the prospect of some time without steady income would ruin you, I'd leave and pursue what you want to pursue.

jameson_903:
hope that an opportunity presents itself magically down the line.

I wouldn't wait for a purple unicorn to fly down from the heavens to save you. You'll just be in the same position in another year or two, facing the same question.

The choice isn't ever going to get easier. The earlier you permit yourself to do what you really want to do, the faster you'll be on your way.

"Son, life is hard. But it's harder if you're stupid." - my dad
 
Best Response

Seconding what Layne Staley wrote.

I love that classic quote: "The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now."

Assuming your search fund model includes a budget-based management fee (to cover a modest livable salary while you execute the search), this is an absolute no-brainer.

If your model as of now does not include the fee, you need to go revise it such that it does. No one backing you for this should be willing to see you starve; it creates a misalignment of incentives where you may be motivated to close on a deal simply because your personal burn rate is heavy and cash cushion is waning rather than because the deal is attractive.

Secondly, make sure you write into your formation docs that you have the freedom to add in other LP capital if you come across it. Have the lawyers include language that any budget-based management fees paid in by the original LP(s) will be reimbursed plus interest pro rata to the new LP(s) investment.

That shouldn't be an issue at all. If someone is willing to back you at all, they ought to be happy to see you scale your basis for success.

You will be surprised how easy it is to make a positive impression in the fairly insular community of search fund LPs. There are three prominent b-school conferences each year: GSB (usually September), Booth (usually November), and HBS (usually December).

You'll meet like-minded peers with backgrounds both identical to your own and a bit different (operational rather than financial), faculty and former search fund principals who are there to give back by sharing lessons with a younger generation, and the institutional or private HNW investors who deploy capital into the asset class.

You're actually in the best shape of any aspiring search fund principal attending those events because you already have seven figures of committed capital), so when you're introducing yourself informally to the other attendees, you're automatically going to get a lot of attention.

This means you will be in a favorable position where can you vet the b-school students or other PE 'drop outs' for a potential partner in your fund. Secondly, you'll probably 3-5x your committed capital. It's like every other fund strategy; no one wants to be first money in, but once you look like the guy the other girls want to date, you find yourself drowning in it.

(Seriously consider finding a partner. Entrepreneurship through acquisition is challenging primarily for how much of a mess even the best run micro-businesses are. You buy the thing because it has healthy financials and a clear path to growth, but you find yourself bogged down in day-to-day operational stuff that anyone with half a brain [but clearly not prior management] could do. You want a second or third set of competent hands on your side where you can amortize that pain and regain some bandwidth to focus on the truly high-level strategic stuff.)

Don't be apprehensive about scaling your committed asset base. You are going to do the same amount of work for a $2m EV acquisition as you are for a $20m one, but assuming the same relative performance improvement (e.g. 5-10x EBITDA growth) holds true, you get paid dramatically better.

Lastly, from how you write I get the sense that you're in the UK or somewhere else outside the States. I want to caveat my prior comments about your ability to scale assets with the point that I don't know how strongly enthusiastic the investor set is going to be about a foreign investment. Ignore this if you're already in the States.

Best of luck.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Thank you all for the replies, valuable to get perspectives and gives me something to think about.

Thak you APAE for the in-depth reply as well. I am outside the US, but these points are all valid and to be considered. I appreciate you taking the time and write up this, as it is really informative.

takenotes08 I will send you PM.

 

Dolorem eius quod eaque et. Labore explicabo consequatur consequatur.

Temporibus et velit unde et sed ut id. Nihil sit eum voluptates. Quia nulla qui in et.

Illo illum ratione animi dicta in velit. Totam quam est voluptatem sunt. Voluptatem qui excepturi est pariatur. Nobis ipsum possimus alias voluptatem aut harum non. Temporibus est delectus aut saepe. Accusamus magni velit deserunt quos quia quis qui.

Global buyer of highly distressed industrial companies. Pays Finder Fees Criteria = $50 - $500M revenues. Highly distressed industrial. Limited Reps and Warranties. Can close in 1-2 weeks.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”