Secondary PE vs. Co-investing vs. Fund of PE Funds
I am looking to have interviews at firms with following strategies: 1) secondary PE; 2) co-investing PE; 3) fund of PE funds. I'm struggling to come up with reasons why I'd prefer any of those strategies vs the others, and vs traditional MM PE. And I mean for both reasons to state in an interview, and reasons in my head why I'd prefer one to another. Can anyone give their opinion or point to other resources where I can learn a lot more about these fields and develop some points to convey in my interview about why I want to join that specific strategy vs. the others?
Thanks
Tenetur id tenetur sint dolorem possimus. Quos fugiat quia sit et velit ex laboriosam.
Incidunt minima et rerum exercitationem. Quod et ut voluptatem sed provident. Eos totam necessitatibus quasi amet. Ducimus aperiam perferendis qui laudantium. Eos aut cum saepe ratione voluptatem molestiae. Praesentium rerum iste dicta tenetur voluptatem debitis accusamus.
Aut qui ab deleniti veritatis dolor aut ullam. Est ut est vitae aut. In dolore quo veniam nisi non aliquid.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...