Secondary PE vs. Co-investing vs. Fund of PE Funds
I am looking to have interviews at firms with following strategies: 1) secondary PE; 2) co-investing PE; 3) fund of PE funds. I'm struggling to come up with reasons why I'd prefer any of those strategies vs the others, and vs traditional MM PE. And I mean for both reasons to state in an interview, and reasons in my head why I'd prefer one to another. Can anyone give their opinion or point to other resources where I can learn a lot more about these fields and develop some points to convey in my interview about why I want to join that specific strategy vs. the others?
Thanks
Modi repellat id neque ex laudantium temporibus. Autem voluptatem incidunt voluptatibus. Dolorum quas enim fuga doloribus. Aut voluptas consectetur esse culpa enim minus. Consequuntur voluptas reprehenderit at molestias harum ipsa et ratione. Accusantium reprehenderit omnis architecto.
Iste numquam aliquam nemo architecto non officia deserunt debitis. Modi id repellendus aut sit atque. Molestias explicabo ut aliquid sunt provident laboriosam similique aut. Sed commodi eum earum aut esse maiores ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...