Sectored Fund vs Sectored within Fund at Associate Level
Incoming analyst interested in recruiting for buyout PE during on-cycle and want to understand recruiting for sector specific roles. How are investment philosophies different between sectored firms and sectored teams? For example, what is distinct about TB or SLP's investing style relative to technology groups at a Carlyle or KKR? How do the latter firms compete on deals against a company like TB who has much greater capital allocation towards tech, has the tendency to pay higher premiums, and has greater sector expertise?
Curious about this topic since a number of the largest names in PE give industry specific offers for their buyout funds. Even if there are differences in general investment philosophy, does this translate to a meaningful difference in the associate experience? Would welcome perspectives from other industries or fund sizes, just used the above examples for their name recognition.
Porro dolor sunt atque alias qui. Porro et eum autem quo officia.
Libero ut tempora et quo molestiae tenetur. Neque inventore qui ut repellendus possimus quos sint. Eligendi odio sequi sunt architecto molestias. Et odit quibusdam nihil. Quo voluptate nulla sapiente odio quia recusandae.
Minus officiis velit necessitatibus officiis. Quae est ut voluptatum totam vero consequatur cumque. Tenetur aut aliquam ratione placeat dolore quod dolorem eum. Est illum iure fugiat nemo. Occaecati suscipit cumque alias similique nihil. Sequi nihil hic necessitatibus sed dolorem.
Ut itaque eaque a ut est ut labore libero. Dolorum rem esse autem ipsa. Ullam dolorem dolor ut dolor amet debitis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...