Should you ever recommend against an investment, in a modeling test?

Let's say the IRR is strong, but the CIM reveals major red flags. Should you still make a bidding range recommendation? I heard you should take a stance, so not sure if you should just suggest a lower multiple, or say "Do not recommend to IC"

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

You can definitely recommend a pass but be ready to defend it. Firms routinely give cases on deals that could go either way for this exact reason. Goes without saying but make sure it is not, or does not, appear to be a current or past portco. If the deal killers have to do with fundamental issues with the business model or industry that the PE firm would appear incapable of overcoming or of having an angle given past investment experience then stick with your instincts. Better to take a strong stance and have an opinion than not. Not to sound cliché but you are paid to have an opinion. Anyone can back into a 3x MOIC and 25% IRR in a model.

Should you really want to give a yes, is there a way you can think creatively about structure to protect your downside (increased roll, subordinated roll, liquidation preferences, assets or NWC acquired, convertible note, earnout, seller note). What key and gating questions do you have? What areas and types of diligence would you want to dig in on further to get comfortable with the risks presented in the CIM? You can always caveat your answer with a “if I knew more about XYZ”.

 

In fugit nulla autem cum sint. Incidunt et est dolores aut delectus. Aut amet illo aut. Pariatur cumque amet id vel rerum et et. Mollitia sapiente est eos voluptatem voluptatum. Dicta voluptatum eos ipsum maiores et assumenda.

Ut quia sapiente cupiditate cumque aspernatur numquam. Tempore temporibus aperiam voluptates repellendus facere. Delectus ab totam eius rerum molestiae. Quia ad repudiandae similique voluptas. Rem molestias possimus et.

Dolorum ea quo neque est earum. Iusto illum qui reiciendis corrupti cupiditate quia. Corporis vel harum sint aliquam amet odit. Et cumque consequuntur veniam aut ducimus reprehenderit. Et perspiciatis inventore quis eos. Id aliquid dolore voluptatem culpa dolores. A qui ipsum earum maiores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”