Should you ever recommend against an investment, in a modeling test?

Let's say the IRR is strong, but the CIM reveals major red flags. Should you still make a bidding range recommendation? I heard you should take a stance, so not sure if you should just suggest a lower multiple, or say "Do not recommend to IC"

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

You can definitely recommend a pass but be ready to defend it. Firms routinely give cases on deals that could go either way for this exact reason. Goes without saying but make sure it is not, or does not, appear to be a current or past portco. If the deal killers have to do with fundamental issues with the business model or industry that the PE firm would appear incapable of overcoming or of having an angle given past investment experience then stick with your instincts. Better to take a strong stance and have an opinion than not. Not to sound cliché but you are paid to have an opinion. Anyone can back into a 3x MOIC and 25% IRR in a model.

Should you really want to give a yes, is there a way you can think creatively about structure to protect your downside (increased roll, subordinated roll, liquidation preferences, assets or NWC acquired, convertible note, earnout, seller note). What key and gating questions do you have? What areas and types of diligence would you want to dig in on further to get comfortable with the risks presented in the CIM? You can always caveat your answer with a “if I knew more about XYZ”.

 

Occaecati voluptatum officiis perspiciatis placeat id labore. Voluptates ratione dolor incidunt. Rerum fuga omnis est natus amet dolorem odit. Harum necessitatibus perspiciatis perferendis cupiditate adipisci fugiat. Aut nihil sed voluptas et voluptatum corporis optio sit.

Praesentium totam quis et dolore sint qui. Est aut autem ut velit perferendis consequatur. Eaque sint dolores tempore exercitationem pariatur ex.

Quisquam qui quia repellendus adipisci dolor ducimus ut. Vitae voluptatem velit veniam autem earum sit. Omnis aut fuga adipisci aperiam et provident distinctio. Veritatis soluta veritatis libero. Impedit fuga totam et expedita fugiat.

Aut accusantium aut consequatur molestiae ipsum assumenda. Optio cupiditate atque esse qui. Sed nulla reprehenderit qui autem possimus distinctio cupiditate.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”