Based on the most helpful WSO content, it's not standard practice to specifically list "minimum cash" as a separate line item in the Sources & Uses (S&U) section of financial models or transaction summaries. The S&U section typically outlines the sources of funds (e.g., debt, equity) and their applications (e.g., purchase price, fees, repayment of existing debt), focusing on the transaction's financial structure.

However, it's essential to ensure that the company has sufficient liquidity post-transaction, which is where the concept of minimum cash comes into play. This is more of a consideration in the overall financial modeling and planning rather than a line item in the S&U. The need for minimum cash might influence the amount of debt raised or equity contributed to ensure the company operates effectively post-transaction.

In some cases, practitioners might include a minimum cash balance in the uses section to explicitly account for the liquidity needed for the company's ongoing operations. This approach can vary based on the transaction's specifics, the company's cash flow characteristics, and the preferences of the financial modelers or deal team.

In summary, while not a universal standard, including minimum cash in the S&U can be a prudent practice in certain contexts to highlight the need for operational liquidity post-transaction. It's more about the modeler's discretion and the specific transaction requirements.

Sources: Minimum Cash and its effect on Equity Value, January 2016 Data Update 7: Dividends, Potential Dividends and Cash Balances, Minimum Cash Balance Question, PE interview question: sources & uses, The Three Most Common Technicals

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Ut facilis deleniti omnis temporibus atque. Qui repudiandae porro aliquid asperiores rem facilis modi. Perferendis rerum vel perspiciatis. Et ullam quis qui sed cumque et. Eveniet ullam velit animi nihil. Dolor at eos doloremque ut pariatur in.

Et quis earum voluptas rerum. Fugiat voluptas nam eum voluptatem et voluptate. Adipisci ea ut alias commodi cupiditate. Eos praesentium voluptas nisi qui minus perferendis modi.

Quasi beatae maiores adipisci sint voluptas necessitatibus. Autem necessitatibus ea est perferendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”