Sources and Uses
Is it standard practice in the industry to put minimum cash to balance sheet as a use in the S&U section? Have seen it done both ways. Thanks.
Is it standard practice in the industry to put minimum cash to balance sheet as a use in the S&U section? Have seen it done both ways. Thanks.
+30 | To all associates coming up on the 2 year mark, how bad is it to have no deals done? | 9 | 14m | |
+27 | Easiest way to make about $2mm/y | 19 | 1d | |
+26 | VP Level - when to follow up after final round | 10 | 1d | |
+20 | Vista Lateral Associate | 9 | 2s | |
+16 | IB/PE Lifers, Was It Worth It? | 5 | 15h | |
+14 | Sr Asso / VP Unemployment Check-in | 2 | 35m | |
+14 | EBITDA walkdown to cash flow for debt service | 10 | 5d | |
+14 | What do you hate the most about second round diligence? | 9 | 4d | |
+14 | Boss says one thing and does another | 7 | 3s | |
+13 | Why is Blackstone so dominant? | 9 | 3d |
Career Resources
Based on the most helpful WSO content, it's not standard practice to specifically list "minimum cash" as a separate line item in the Sources & Uses (S&U) section of financial models or transaction summaries. The S&U section typically outlines the sources of funds (e.g., debt, equity) and their applications (e.g., purchase price, fees, repayment of existing debt), focusing on the transaction's financial structure.
However, it's essential to ensure that the company has sufficient liquidity post-transaction, which is where the concept of minimum cash comes into play. This is more of a consideration in the overall financial modeling and planning rather than a line item in the S&U. The need for minimum cash might influence the amount of debt raised or equity contributed to ensure the company operates effectively post-transaction.
In some cases, practitioners might include a minimum cash balance in the uses section to explicitly account for the liquidity needed for the company's ongoing operations. This approach can vary based on the transaction's specifics, the company's cash flow characteristics, and the preferences of the financial modelers or deal team.
In summary, while not a universal standard, including minimum cash in the S&U can be a prudent practice in certain contexts to highlight the need for operational liquidity post-transaction. It's more about the modeler's discretion and the specific transaction requirements.
Sources: Minimum Cash and its effect on Equity Value, January 2016 Data Update 7: Dividends, Potential Dividends and Cash Balances, Minimum Cash Balance Question, PE interview question: sources & uses, The Three Most Common Technicals
Ut facilis deleniti omnis temporibus atque. Qui repudiandae porro aliquid asperiores rem facilis modi. Perferendis rerum vel perspiciatis. Et ullam quis qui sed cumque et. Eveniet ullam velit animi nihil. Dolor at eos doloremque ut pariatur in.
Et quis earum voluptas rerum. Fugiat voluptas nam eum voluptatem et voluptate. Adipisci ea ut alias commodi cupiditate. Eos praesentium voluptas nisi qui minus perferendis modi.
Quasi beatae maiores adipisci sint voluptas necessitatibus. Autem necessitatibus ea est perferendis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...