I’m an associate at a MM tech fund (think STG/PSG/Great Hill) on a career path and clear promotion route that just got an offer to join a MF (think Thoma/Vista/Silver Lake) and questioning if the move makes sense.
I would be restarting my associate years and the career path is less secure but salary is substantially more as well as brand recognition. I expect hours to be the same.
What would you do?
| +89 | Nothing to do at work & bored to hell | 9 | 1d |
| +67 | Do people over-index on 'moats' | 22 | 17h |
| +52 | Predicted Net Worth in Trodden Finance Path by 60? | 20 | 1d |
| +44 | Biggest (avoidable) failures in PE Investments? | 25 | 19h |
| +38 | Why is ROIC never really a topic when looking at companies IRL | 11 | 4d |
| +24 | What do you think of PE Value Creation Careers in 2026? | 7 | 31m |
| +15 | Honest opinions needed about lateraling | 5 | 3m |
| +12 | NY LMM PE Recruiting | 3 | 1d |
| +12 | How to approach Buyside Recruiting | 3 | 5d |
| +11 | Is it too late for me? (Rising College Junior) | 3 | 17h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Brand and comp vs certainty of progression. If you want optionality and bigger future paydays/exits, go MF. If you want a predictable timeline and less ambiguity, stay. Not a right answer just what matters most to you.
Would love to learn more about your recruiting process. Can you pm?
How certain are you that you will be promoted to senior associate and (more importantly) VP at your current fund? If certain, I'd stay there
For the MF, do you fully need to restart the associate years (i.e., if you're a 2Y associate now, you'd be joining at the same level as incoming banking hires) or would it just be 1 extra year (redoing 2Y associate)? If you need to fully re-do associate years, I would probably pass on that. Also I would pass if it's Vista (v. Thoma / SL) since their future trajectory doesn't seem certain / attractive enough to warrant the risk of the move (+ see the recent statements from Robert Smith on plans for AI-driven headcount reduction - not that it wouldn't impact the overall industry, but seems like they're looking to be a first mover)
Qui odit quidem eaque. Velit a cumque labore non culpa quis.
Consequatur molestiae provident vel ipsum quisquam nisi ducimus est. Enim cum quam possimus sunt. Similique repellat tempore aspernatur corrupti quae. Vel fugit alias iusto ut voluptas quia quis. Aut id mollitia fugiat magni mollitia dignissimos dolores.
Incidunt quo aliquam cumque dolore velit impedit. Tenetur mollitia porro nihil alias non ipsam unde. Et illum qui commodi fugit id.
Rerum atque iste corrupti sint sunt cumque. Vitae illum et at provident dolor aliquam. Voluptates iure eum assumenda soluta.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...