I work in PE and have been digging into how AI can drive operational improvements in portfolio companies, especially in business services. Early numbers suggest 3-4% EBITDA margin improvement is achievable through automation and efficiency gains in some cases.
Wanted to get a pulse on what others believe:
- Is this actually exciting or just hype?
- What are your expectations for AI in portcos?
- Have you tried implementing anything yet?
- Anyone have wins (or horror stories) to share?
For context, I'm looking at business services companies where labor is 50%+ of revenue - insurance brokers, staffing, etc. Seems like low-hanging fruit but interested in other sectors too.
Happy to share what I'm finding. Anyone down to compare notes?
Focus on the back office first. Finance, legal, compliance all have real verticalized solutions that can actually cut down a lot of time and resources on non-revenue generating activity. That's applicable across your entire portfolio, then you can go into specific issues like calculating broker commissions, streamlining compliance for staffing agencies, or processing small government RFPs.
My firm does this across our portfolio currently and we are in the process of measuring value uplift at our portcos but initial results are positive. The main challenge is the change management in the portco once our deployment ends as they have to use the new technology/tool we build for them to good effect and this can take time to train talent (or hire externally).
See the following thread https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/value-creation-in-pe-leveraging-data-science-and-machine-learning
Hey, can I DM you?
I would love to chat briefly and learn more from your experiences.
Very grateful for anything you can share.
Just talk to the AI it's clear you're outsourcing all your thinking to it anyway.
Mods, kill it with fire
I think we have skipped a critical step. In my workplace, building internal tools through code is a lot more reliable and accessible and extremely high-leverage, whereas AI is harder to do well (training an internal model) and higher risk due to hallucinations.
I was thinking more of purchasing available AI solutions for your vertical, as opposed to taking on the risk of doing internal development.
E.g., in your case, it would mean using AI tools even for software development such as Cursor or Lovable.
I was thinking more of purchasing available AI solutions for your vertical, as opposed to taking on the risk of doing internal development.
E.g., in your case, it would mean using AI tools even for software development such as Cursor or Lovable.
Aliquam exercitationem sed reprehenderit eius quae iusto. Deserunt nulla facilis numquam vel non. Animi non architecto magnam occaecati. Voluptatem nihil molestias voluptatem et odit omnis. Voluptas maiores est quia tenetur eaque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...