Feeling dejected after oncycle day 1–crashed on three of my top firms in the earlier rounds, and sort of picked up steam at the end of the day but was crushed by then. any suggestions are very much appreciated.
| +89 | Nothing to do at work & bored to hell | 9 | 1d |
| +67 | Do people over-index on 'moats' | 22 | 1d |
| +53 | Predicted Net Worth in Trodden Finance Path by 60? | 20 | 1d |
| +44 | Biggest (avoidable) failures in PE Investments? | 25 | 1d |
| +38 | Why is ROIC never really a topic when looking at companies IRL | 11 | 4d |
| +24 | What do you think of PE Value Creation Careers in 2026? | 7 | 10h |
| +15 | Honest opinions needed about lateraling | 5 | 8h |
| +12 | NY LMM PE Recruiting | 3 | 2d |
| +12 | How to approach Buyside Recruiting | 3 | 5d |
| +10 | Is the lifestyle really better? | 6 | 2h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
The number shouldn't effect whether or not you'll be successful in another process. But failing that many in a row in the early rounds might be indicative of a broader problem in how you're interviewing. Would go back and review what went wrong in the others. Ask for feedback if you have any warm connects/had good conversations. If it's technical, easy fix. If it's behavioral, will take more work.
What happened in each that got you out? Any feedback from HHs after?
Haven’t asked / don’t think it’s right to? Is that normal to do so?
What do u think happened? Just not prep well enough?
Completely fine to ask and good ones can give detailed feedback
Interviewed at 20+ funds across my time in banking, got mostly wrecked in on-cycle + to later stages in a few processes that didn’t pan out. Ended up at a top MF at the end, don’t beat yourself up but just keep going and figure out what you need to adjust
Did striking out in those on cycle processes hurt your relationships with HHs at all? I’m considering just trying with the MFs I get even though I’m not confident but the only reason I’m reasoning against it is that I’ve heard that they tell HHs if you do poorly which makes them reluctant to but you in front of other top firms.
Not that I could tell, I don't think I did so poorly as to have the firms pass along negative feedback to the HH and the HH understand that these firms are only hiring a small portion of those that they interview + the firms I interviewed with were across multiple HHs so each would have only put me in front of 1-2 firms
I will say, if you think you're unprepared now there is a risk of interviewing at a MF and striking out + wasting your opportunity (most won't re-interview candidates, unless they do group specific recruiting), so I'd be honest with yourself on if it makes sense to push now or wait and target off-cycle opportunities when you may be more prepped. With that said, interviewing was a good forcing mechanism for preparation, I learned a lot from the different processes I was in even if they didn't work out
Why do u think oncycle didn’t fare well? Just too early and not prepped enough?
If you interviewed at that many funds, how were you ultimately able to land a MF offer? Was it through off-cycle?
Yes off-cycle
Irrelvant. Doesn't really matter where you striked out, they'll keep giving you things because they are incentivized to place canidates, and they ultimately want to put a lot of canidates in front of their clients. The only thing is they won't show you a fund you striked out off again (i.e. if you striked out at Hg, you won't be showed Hg again). Each process is different and it's all idiosyncratic; very possible you strike out at modelling test / first round at one MF and end up getting the offer at another for example. Just treat each as a learning opportunity and don't make the same mistakes. Even if you fail in on-cycle, you will get more opportunities for off-cycle.
Through my entire career I’ve been rejected by ~25+ funds and gotten 5 offers so fear not
thank you sir. makes me feel better. know I’m capable and yes the idiosyncrasies are what get to my head. lot out of my control and using that as a basis to determine my worth atm
Never good to place your worth in just the job; that's how you end up the MD in banking or PE who hates their wife and kids; and only is good at his job with no other skills.
Been going PF from scratch but keep getting cut after several technical and behavioral rounds following the model test. think it’s either because I’m not completing all the bonus bells and whistles or my main basic build is wrong? Returns have all come back in line
Were your model tests all from scratch or from a template? I could do PF lvl 4 from scratch but I had a model test this week from a template that threw me off + it was a time crunch. So I'm going to keep practicing the one I have until I can absolutely fly threw it.
The issue I think is that PF doesn't show teach you that well how to build the cash flow statement into the model (since Matt's templates /model tests just build down to it within the financial forecast). This is a big part of what threw me off during my test. Lmk what your experience was, want to make sure I'm as prepared as possible for the next one
Wym
I don’t know how to tell you this but building out a complete cash flow statement is basically exactly the same as Matt’s build. Would recommend you look at a few 10-Ks so you can learn how they look.
Keep a log of all the interview questions you got and drill them - all these interview processes are more similar than they are different. Keep drilling on LBO practice models and technicals. Do practice interviews with 2nd years with jobs at your bank who you're friends with.
Lastly, keep going. This is a game of attrition. Every interview is another practice rep and your competition is getting worn down faster than you. Not uncommon to get a job in week 2-3 after on cycle kicks off.
Similar to other stories here — I was at GS/MS, struck out with 10+ MFs/UMM funds, ended up in LMM and then lateraled to UMM. Now trying to lateral from UMM for VP roles and have gotten looks from MFs that was rejected for as an analyst. It’s not the end of the world and you just need to keep at it. Careers are long and twisty.
Yeah not the end of the world. I didn't go on-cyle but got converted my 3rd buyside interview and I had colleagues who got their 11th or 12th process. It sometimes takes time but I'd keep interviewing and getting better when the opportunities arise. I also think my friends who stayed in banking have more fun on the job than me so theres that.
Qui assumenda aut consequatur rerum id voluptatem. Molestias quasi repellendus expedita. Quidem quisquam perspiciatis consequatur laboriosam quo accusamus autem consequuntur. Blanditiis nobis enim quae distinctio est. Numquam perspiciatis alias est aliquid.
Tenetur modi eos accusantium officia ut minus. Veritatis omnis corrupti beatae eum fuga nihil rerum. Minus soluta sed est repellendus debitis quis occaecati quia. Ea placeat sed fuga voluptatibus quae similique provident. Enim voluptatem eius aliquid dolores quia dolor enim. Esse illum numquam eaque.
Aliquid tempore nobis quo laboriosam perferendis temporibus sit. Qui nobis et nemo a. Animi accusamus pariatur facilis perferendis. Eligendi sapiente velit sequi aspernatur et aliquid non. Facere ea omnis consequuntur qui enim harum nobis explicabo.
Nostrum sequi iure cupiditate voluptas dignissimos unde aliquam. A reiciendis labore vel autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Aut dolor illum eligendi provident at natus cum deleniti. Ratione eum earum dolorum et quod consequatur dolor. Fugiat officia est doloremque. Vitae consequatur perspiciatis ea sunt aut maiores debitis. Non repellendus non atque perspiciatis sint impedit.