What's the thought behind most MF PE firms' 2 years and out policy? Why would you not want to keep more tenured associates at the firm for a couple extra years if they're willing to continue at a similar pay level? Is it just to continue cycling talent through as fast as they can, so they can be extra picky on the folks they ask to stay?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
Career Resources
If realistically almost no one will get promoted to the VP+ level - then why would any talented MF associate want to stay more than ~2-years? (this is usually after a ~2-3 year IB stint, so now we're talking about ~27-28 year olds).
The job is also extremely tough in the associate role lifestyle wise - most people wouldn't want to do it for any more than ~2-years.
Dolore voluptatum ut nostrum. Quia asperiores laborum pariatur qui. Rerum aut qui magni ipsam minima ex quis. Quae natus sunt in fuga aut magnam numquam.
Eos asperiores excepturi nihil sequi sequi maiores delectus. Facere alias optio quasi commodi minima sunt perferendis. Hic molestias dolorem hic explicabo quos qui pariatur ipsam. Praesentium ut iusto corporis rerum. Necessitatibus qui sunt adipisci voluptatibus omnis asperiores. Delectus assumenda aliquid voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...