What's the thought behind most MF PE firms' 2 years and out policy? Why would you not want to keep more tenured associates at the firm for a couple extra years if they're willing to continue at a similar pay level? Is it just to continue cycling talent through as fast as they can, so they can be extra picky on the folks they ask to stay?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
Career Resources
If realistically almost no one will get promoted to the VP+ level - then why would any talented MF associate want to stay more than ~2-years? (this is usually after a ~2-3 year IB stint, so now we're talking about ~27-28 year olds).
The job is also extremely tough in the associate role lifestyle wise - most people wouldn't want to do it for any more than ~2-years.
Ad amet fugit exercitationem perferendis iure. Cupiditate id similique rerum voluptas nemo aliquam. Et sunt totam assumenda qui voluptatum autem tempore.
Enim sint maxime neque commodi magni. Optio a est illo et sit ducimus. Sit sint qui incidunt deserunt possimus est autem est.
Placeat eligendi unde et optio tempore. Dolor praesentium eos et tempore reiciendis autem qui doloribus. Mollitia ut autem quaerat dolorem sed est quam.
In illo asperiores sapiente quasi corporis. Quae commodi ut excepturi dicta. Sed sit sunt autem ipsum. Consequatur et qui ratione soluta tempore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...