Portfolio Marks
MM Software buyout fund. Looking at the marks in our current portfolio ahead of a fundraise, and they're hyper aggressive. Anyone who's been through a fundraising round -- what do prospective LPs actually see? I'm sure everything that we want to show will be heavily adjusted and sanitized, but even a cursory glance beneath the curtain would not look great. Anyone else have the same thoughts when staring at their current portfolio?
No/minimal markdowns after the SaaSpocolypse? Good luck with the raise.
Yup. I'm at a JAMMBO that is weighted consumer/services and some of our marks are ridiculous. Just looking at revenue and EBITDA $ trends by portco would show how aggressive some of the multiples we're using that wouldn't transact in 2026. One example - we've "switched" a portco from being valued on an EBITDA multiple to a revenue multiple despite it being an EBITDA multiple sector and how we valued it on entry. Just so it would mask the EBITDA decline at the portco.
If I was an LP, don't think I'd invest in my firm's next fund tbh. I get why DPI is the key metric nowadays.
Repellendus maxime dolores repellat consequatur commodi. Numquam sit necessitatibus nisi ex. Qui optio occaecati nesciunt ut soluta eaque veritatis.
Nostrum esse rem et dolor sit. Id est non quaerat minus minima amet eius iusto. Asperiores qui possimus iusto.
Vel delectus odit mollitia. Distinctio quisquam eligendi aliquam. Repellendus exercitationem ducimus laboriosam nobis iusto ratione nesciunt. Omnis in quia quia repellendus quis quibusdam autem quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...