I'm running some rough theoretical numbers on a deal for someone.
If I'm building a 100,000sf Class A/B office building, and all leases are modified gross, are expenses going to exceed ~30%? I don't work a lot on this size of an asset. A new apartment building could operate at ~35% expenses...wouldn't the office building being a lower ratio given the lease structure?
Is it a brand new building? Hard to say without knowing what your market's typical Class A- rents are and PSF real estate taxes. In my east coast market I would say yes, because A- rents are say $50 gross and expenses are close to $23.
Yes, it's being built, so it's new.
Wow, so on full gross leases you're running 46% expenses plus vacancy? That seems high, no?
Office vacancy in the market of my subject property is under 10%. Cap rates average 6.4% regionally. I'm trying to get a rough NOI on this thing.
Rents on this deal appear to be $2.50 modified gross. There is a neighboring building with these lease rates. Also, there is a MOB at $2.25 NNN with .75ft in CAM, so $3 all in. I don't think we have the budget to build MOB, so, $2.5ft MG is what I'm looking at right now for lease rate.
Edit - $30ft MG annually
I'm not sure if ratio is the best way to analyze it, but who knows? I've got a Class B+ office building in the Washington, D.C. market, an older building (late 1960s build) that was gutted and rehabbed in 1998 with Class A tenant improvements/buildouts from 2014 to 2016. Our PSF operating expense is about $12.96 PSF with an expense ratio of 37.43% (when including parking rent and pass through revenue). Building is 83.67% occupied.
Take it for what it's worth as a single comp. I'd give you the rest of my buildings, but they are solid Class B-, at best, and not, in my view, comparable to a Class A building.
EDIT: another way to look at it: 161,102 sf office building; $37.75 PSF base rent across the whole building; $12.96 PSF operating expenses; 83.67% occupied. $37.75 x 83.67% = $31.59. $12.96 / 31.59 = 41%. Although you would need to add back parking rent and expense pass through revenue.
Do you have to give it as a percent estimate? If you break down the expenses, you'll get a far more accurate number.
Thanks for the responses guys. No, it doesn't have to be a percentage, but usually there are consistent patterns with each asset class depending on age, class and lease structure.
This PDF shows expenses more in the 34% to 45% range.
https://www.irem.org/File%20Library/IREM%20Store/Document%20Library/IES…
I wouldn't recommend underwriting an office BOE based on an opex ratio. Instead, you're better off applying a $/sf opex estimate. On most office deals of this size, I have seen opex NOT including real estate taxes come in between $8-12/sf depending on location, operator etc. For taxes you, should estimate the cost based on the location and the tax code there, which you can zero in on by looking at the rates and public records for comparable office buildings.
I would say if your deal pencils after applying the higher end of this $/sf range in addition to your estimated tax burden, then it's worth exploring further.
Ducimus accusamus eligendi delectus labore enim aut. Iusto eius et dolore at aperiam illo vitae. Reiciendis consequatur aut et qui porro dicta eos. Voluptas impedit corporis et dignissimos.
Est odio assumenda dignissimos. Dolores consequatur et dolor doloremque ex laudantium reiciendis et. Numquam doloribus qui accusamus beatae. Enim laudantium dolore et omnis necessitatibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...