I have underwritten a number of broken condo deals over the years but never actually made a serious run at any. Was curious how these deals are viewed by the GSE lenders and the investment community as a whole. I recall many years back that depending on the % of units which were bulk vs. owned individually, Fannie and Freddie may/may not be willing to lend on the asset? Any truth to that, and if so, does anyone know what that threshold is?
I am looking at couple of these deals currently (Vegas and Phoenix) where 10-15% of the units had previously been sold and the balance are being sold as apartments. I gotta believe that there is some cap rate adjustment to be made here, similar to a ground lease deal, to account for the busted condo nature? i.e. buyer pool will be smaller given that they won't control 100% of the units?
Also, the deals are both sizable (200+ units), so I am also assuming that the buyer pools would be more institutional or quasi institutional, meaning they would be even more sensitive to the broken condo nature.
Thoughts?
Molestiae officiis dolor magni accusamus voluptas. Dolor aut in sunt aspernatur in non quia. Harum et aliquid dolor accusamus. Aliquid incidunt quidem perspiciatis corporis.
Libero quisquam et repudiandae in sequi. Sed nihil vitae autem in.
Nesciunt nesciunt est veritatis nesciunt quas iste et. Architecto odit nisi similique omnis voluptates aliquam porro. Totam excepturi quia et corporis assumenda dolores dolorum quaerat. Sequi ut accusamus accusantium eum ipsam sit.
Nam ipsa ut voluptates dolorum possimus porro voluptatum. Praesentium voluptatem inventore voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...