Due Diligence - ALTA Survey
For those of you on a team who preform the due diligence themselves, can you explain how you review an Alta survey and what things you look for? Do you normally interpret the survey yourself or does the surveyor provide a narrative/write up highlighting the important findings?
I’ve briefly seen an Alta survey and it looks very confusing. I’d have no idea what I’d be looking for.
I'm on the debt side, but ATLA's are often a lender requirement and get reviewed by our legal counsel against the title commitment.
A few purposes they serve:
In summary, it's primarily an instrument to determine whether a property confirms to zoning code (I.E, parking minimums, minimum setbacks, density) and confirm/visualize any claims on title.
It should be a mix of yourself and counsel. Every ALTA Survey will be drafted using a title commitment report, which includes the legal descriptions of the property and a list of exceptions on Schedule B that reflects specific items, defects, or encumbrances your title insurance policy will not cover or protect you against.
Your counsel will review the survey and title commitment together. They should be confirming the property boundaries and legal description matches what you're under contract for, verifying there is direct access to a public road or enforceable easement rights, confirming whether the presence of any of these exceptions (recorded easements, utility rights, restrictive covenants, etc.) and information within those underlying recorded documents will impact your willingness to purchase the property. You should be working with your counsel to understand any issues that may arise from this review. Do not ever rely on a surveyor's interpretation of things for findings.
Separately, you should be reviewing the survey to confirm as much as you can as well. Do the parcels and overall property area align with what you underwrote and are expecting to purchase? Are there any right-of-ways or roads separating your parcels? Do the easements cross buildings, structures, parking, development areas, or required access areas? Are there any encroachments or non-conformities from current structures? Buildings, fences, retaining walls, signs, that are crossing property lines or easements? Do setbacks, building lines, parking counts, etc., line up with required zoning items? Is the property in a flood zone and need flood map overlaid? Do you need wetlands delineated on the survey?
Every property will be different, but it's important to look at the survey, review it with the map on the survey and understand the markings on it. Think of your business plan and any potential impact those items that are marked may cause.
Debt side here, but also have experience as both contractor/developer. Enough time in the seat on both sides of the table to have bad experience related to surveys.
Echoing the excellent advise of the two posts above and emphasizing a few points in particular:
Additional comments:
TLDR - surveys are one of those diligence things that require thinking and careful review to get your money's worth. They can be one of those things that you get, let the attorney review, and put in the file and don't think about ever again. More often than not - that will work out well. But when it doesn't... it's probably gonna be bad.
Necessitatibus quod enim nemo ea et reiciendis sequi. Consequuntur inventore vel recusandae. Quo perferendis consequuntur quo est eos illum ea. Sequi incidunt et et voluptatem magnam omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...