Extremely wide mandate fund

Which repe funds have you seen with the broadest mandate or no mandate whatsoever other than needing to hit whatever their target pref and near their target returns are? I’m talking any asset class, any geography, anywhere in the capital stack, any strategy, public or private?

 
Most Helpful

Since I have access to the Green Street Real Estate Alert HY fund database (and apparently bored on a Sunday), I logged in and searched for active funds using the screening criteria "Opportunity" for fund type and "Diverse" for asset class. To be clear, no idea of any of these funds would actually have as wide a mandate as you are asking (especially when you mix "public" in the list), but I've heard that the fund docs are often pretty unrestricted for bigger names that have the clout to get away with anything (essentially Blackstone is who I am referring to, but beyond me to know how true this is or what it means in practicality. 

Here is a sampling of the results.... (roughly largest to smallest, ignoring funds from an operators once they make it on list)

Blackstone Real Estate Partners 9

Brookfield Strategic Real Estate Partners 3

Starwood Opportunity Fund 11 Global

Carlyle Realty Partners 8

TPG Real Estate Partners 3

Secured Capital Real Estate Partners 7 (PAG Real Estate)

North Haven Real Estate Fund 9 Global (Morgan Stanley)

Rockpoint Real Estate Fund 6

KKR Real Estate Partners Americas 2

There are tons more, but that's enough for now! Get a different list when I switch to "Value-Add", but same idea. In reality, it's just a matter of what these operators can convince their LPs they should allowed to do when fund raising. Clearly, in an SMA the LP can specify anything they want/don't want. 

 

I think this is a hard topic to answer without actually seeing fund docs. Have worked on entity level deals and whenever we bring them to Carlyle’s RE fund they say can’t do entity level deals. They do have a separate fund in NYC that looks at real estate entity level deals although it’s not specifically a RE fund. Same with their RE debt deals - have brought them large RE portfolio financings and it basically goes to their LevFin fund as opposed to the RE fund. 

 

Very true, and to be clear, I am not implying these funds can do "anything", fund docs govern. Free form is usually disadvantageous to raising large amounts of capital, but the big PE names tend to have the credibility to get away with more "random" moves than others. Such as venturing into Single Family Homes after the 08 GFC for example, not something that funds other than the Blackstone and Starwood types would likely have been able to do within existing structures. 

To the OP, I should add that most major investment managers (like PGIM, CBRE GI, etc.) will often chose to create "specialty" funds (like Seniors Housing Fund X) as it has better fund raising advantage; meaning they can get bigger overall investment $$$ from each LP (like CalPERS) with multiple, distinct strategy funds as this is how the investment managers/allocators generally prefer to invest. 

The large field "opportunity" fund model has become more of specialized, multi-fund options (like ordering off a menu) as real estate allocations are so much larger now than decades before. BX, SW, KKR still like using the large open-strategy, high-yield target model as it better fits with their overall PE business model and LPs still like investing in those funds (prior results lead to hopefulness of future returns). 

 

Odio non perferendis repellendus. Error voluptatem beatae consequatur.

Eos nemo voluptatibus minus dignissimos est nemo dolorem non. Sit excepturi iure dolore similique necessitatibus animi fugiat. Eligendi impedit quae et non sit. Dolorem quibusdam nisi dolorum accusantium. Rerum soluta voluptas quia magni inventore distinctio. Id labore velit odio qui. Provident odio repellat facilis qui est.

Sunt facilis ut unde. Tempore quis reprehenderit qui consequatur delectus minus inventore illum. Adipisci inventore ut velit pariatur perspiciatis non placeat et.

Animi voluptatem illum minima blanditiis sit ducimus. Eos culpa laudantium quibusdam eos molestiae. Est eum sunt quod quo quis dolorem natus. Iusto voluptatibus eligendi error et. Esse quod quae recusandae nobis provident ut dolorem. Sed at eum vitae vel similique et sit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”