HOW DO YOU DETERMINE YOUR UNIT MIX?

What are the best ways to understand your market's unit mix for a new multi-family development? Do you rely on architect as well as your inputs? do you study market absorption?

What is the financial logic behind choosing to build out a 1 bed + den versus a 2 bedroom? I know this can be for marketing purposes.

Also - how will we see impacts on floor-plans post-covid world? Since larger buildings with co-working space has been the trend these past few years, will we see any unit mix changes or will it most likely stay the same?

 

from a low level perspective, during my Internship I had to propose a new development. The way I went about it was using my market study and seeing what the area demanded and how comps were occupied based off their unit mix. I also paid attention to density limits and tried to optimize rental revenue in my model based off various unit mixes. Hope this helps and if anyone with more knowledge can expand that would be great.

 

It's art, not science, but heavily influenced by the site characteristics and building codes.

I.e. if you have a large suburban plot of land, you can probably tell your architect exactly how to map out each floor. If you are on a urban plot, you only get so many feet of windows/views, that kinda restricts how many bedrooms you can get and what size the units can be. You can make calls of 1 beds vs. 2 beds, but you are trading off two units for one unit quite often.

The 1 bed + den or 2 bed is exactly the kind of thing physical site characteristics force you to do. The den probably has no window or it is too small to be a functional or legal bedroom. Had there been more room, it could have been another unit or a two-bed unit.

 
Most Helpful

Really solid thread idea, @yayaa" . Love these kind of specific questions. redever nailed it in saying that it is an art not a science.

Unit size and unit mix are both major drivers for an apartment project and getting both right is incredibly important.

To determine what would be ideal for a specific development, you have to take into account:

  • Market Comps - i.e. what currently exists in the market. Consider this your baseline. When you do or pay for your initial market study, you want to see how big the units are. You want to see how many 1BRs there are compared to 2BRs. You want to note if there are any 3BRs. You want to know how all of these lease compared to each other and you'll ask the people at the property which type of units fly off the shelves faster. You then compare the unit sizes to the project age - typically older deals will have bigger units, so you can discount those some. Finally, you look at the specific floorplans to make sure a floorplan isn't just not leasing because it flat out sucks. Lord knows some architects design some dumbass floorplans and some developers are happy to rubber stamp them. Remember too that while developers care about $/SF - renters don't give a shit. If your competitor has a 750 SF 1BR going for $1,500, and you can build a 700 SF apartment that doesn't "feel" any smaller because it's a better floorplan and charge $1,450 a month, you're not only winning the PSF battle but the renter is also saving money every month.

  • Target Market - This is how you determine how to respond to your comp set. Typically, a younger target demographic means your units can be smaller and there will be more 1BRs than 2BRs, but there are always exceptions. Likewise, the more urban the project is, the smaller the units will typically be and the more 1BRs there typically will be. A old school garden deal may be 50/50 or 55/45. A newer wrap deal may be 60/40 or 65/35. A high rise could be 75/25 or 80/20. Or, if you are specifically targeting a group of people like wealthy empty nesters who are looking for apartments for a year while they sell their mansion and figure out where they want to buy a condo in relation to their beach house, you know that there's no way they're downsizing from a 7,500 SF house to a 1BR - so you build bigger units, more 2BRs, and make sure you have tons of rentable storage.

  • Construction Type - This one is slightly more out of your hands. A high rise is always more constrained, unit-wise, than a wrap deal, and a garden deal is fully customizable. In a high rise, your architect has to work much harder on fitting units into your building, making those units intelligently designed, and giving you the mix you want. This is because the land is always more constrained, making the building more constrained, and there is infinitely more engineering involved.

  • Efficiency - Finally, efficiency is a big one. Make sure your corridors are double loaded as much as possible (aka make sure the hallway has doors on both sides, not only one). Make sure there isn't wasted space in the corners. Make sure the amenities and leasing office are put in intelligent locations. Make sure the grade doesn't screw you out of half a floor of units. Don't go building any more kitchens and bathrooms than you absolutely have to - because those always cost a whole lot more than a bedroom does.

At the end of the day, you will give your architect guidance and a framework to work within, you'll take what the architect gives you and input it into your model, you'll play around with it some and probably drive your architect crazy by asking for revisions, and then you'll have bigger things to worry about so you'll make the call. At the end of the day, does it matter if your building is 65/35 vs. 70/30? Yes. Does it matter more than a hundred of other things? Not really - you're either right or you know next time to adjust.

Now post COVID-19, I am most interested in two things - one major and one minor.

The minor trend that interests me will be dens/in-unit offices/work from home space. Dens, typically, fell out of fashion during this current market. They still existed in some high end in-town deals that needed to fill space in a high-rise or otherwise simply differentiate themselves from the market and also in some garden deals that simply had the space, but by and large dens were far more prevalent in pre-2008 buildings.

I've seen a lot of articles written by people clearly not that tied into the industry about COVID-19 making co-working and shared office spaces a new thing in multifamily amenity areas, but I've been building those for 3+ years - that isn't anything new. Not only that, but the shared office space in our amenity areas is in the top tier of "amenities people actually use" - unlike that expensive sofa and TV setup that is only there for looks.

I'm interested in how many people actually switch to work from home, because if it's a lot, a handful of micro offices or a well designed WeWork lookalike open space isn't going to cut it. If the hyper-aggressive work from home predictions are right, people are going to want work from home space. This could lead to the emergence of dens. This could lead to larger kitchens in smaller 1BRs and 2BRs that usually only have a bar counter. This could lead to the 1BR/2BR split shifting back toward 2BRs. I'm not sure how it's going to play out, if it does, but it's something to keep an eye on.

The larger trend I'm interested in seeing is urban vs. suburban living. One of the overarching theses over this cycle is that if given the choice between a $1,800 650 SF 1BR brand new in an ideal location and a $1,800 1,100 SF 2BR older building in the burbs, millennials will almost always be willing to pay for the in-town product. This idea has driven much of the apartment development market this entire cycle, because it isn't wrong. Location, Location, Location, right?

Well, I'm wondering about two forces that may counteract this. The first is mass unemployment. As I'm writing this, we are almost up to 40 million people newly unemployed. The underemployed number is tens of millions higher. People may no longer be able to chose between a new build in town $1,800 650 SF 1BR and an equally priced 2BR outside of town in an older building. They may have to get a 650 SF 1BR outside of town in an older building just to afford rent. We're already underwriting zero rent growth through lease-up moving forward and only 1%-1.5% the year after that.

The second goes back to the work from home argument. I think the death of the office talk is outrageously overblown, but office doesn't have to die for it to have an impact. If even 5%-10% more people work from home, perhaps the location vs. extra space argument no longer tilts dramatically toward location. Perhaps after being cramped into their 650 SF apartment for two months, people will value space a whole lot more.

It's hard to tell. Things always change, and sometimes in ways you don't necessarily predict, and usually 2-3 years behind when people decide that they should change due to project timelines, but it's always something to keep an eye on.

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

Great post. I'll add parking and lease-up.

Parking - some municipalities require 1 space per bedroom and often parking is the cap on density with surface parked deals. If your choice is 1 (3BR) Unit or 3 (1BR) units, for the same parking, you can easily talk yourself into more 1BRs. This becomes a bigger factor if the land price if fixed as the increased density lowers land costs per unit, adding to the efficiency part above.

Lease-up - There are less 3BR renters out there and they move slower. So, if you need a quick lease-up, then a bunch of cheaper 1BRs is easier to fill with warm bodies than the top of the market 3BR. Turnover is higher in smaller units (less stuff more mobile) so it’s an IRR play more than long term hold.

This past cycle saw a boom in micro units and studios as developers told the story “that millennials want to live DT and only sleep at home.” The truth is costs rose quicker than rents so the only way to lease anything people could afford was to maximize efficiency and cram as many units in the building as possible.

“Capitalism: God’s way of determining who is smart and who is poor.” Ron Swanson
 

Excellent response with great information.

Can I ask why older buildings tend to have larger units? Is it because code/zoning has restricited size/units over time? Or is it more of a "current market" element where developers are focused on squeezing in more units now than they did lets say 30 years ago? Hope that makes sense.

 

CRE you hit on a lot of the things that I am thinking of as well. I agree with you that people acting as if all companies are going to go the route of Twitter and move to 100% remote working is ridiculous. However, I think a lot of companies are going to shift to smaller office spaces with a mix of hub-and-spoke and hotel models (and of course more flexible remote working schedules). Anecdotally, both my (small RE firm) and fiance's (Fortune 500) have announced some version of the above.

Even if only 10% of white-collar employees are impacted by this change, which feels low, that has a massive impact down-the-line on just about every asset class. The impact on multifamily feels like an opportunity to me, versus, say, office or hospitality where this effect will be deflationary (and office to an extreme level). I agree, buildings in the future will need to be designed to accomodate remote working. That means more desk space, dens, outlets, USB ports, better Wifi (if the building provides it) in units, and for urban MF especially, a significant increase in space dedicated to shared office and fitness amentiies.

Questions that I'm asking are: Especially in high-cost cities, many couples share a one-bedroom. If both individuals work from home at least part of the time, is this still feasible? I can count on both hands couples we know that live in a small one-bed apartment downtown that are now looking to move farther from downtown in exchange for more space. Are a concerning number of new tower developments that built a large number of 1BD units because of favorable $/SF's now at least partially obselete? Will the new value add be taking apart seldom used game/lounge rooms in favor of additional shared work space? How much shared office SF will be required per resident? Is this something that can produce revenue, or is it just a cost? Does SFR development become more and more attractive as renter's look for more space? What effect does more time spent at home have on how units are designed? Do people want larger kitchens? More entertaining space? Does Covid move more people out of downtowns in favor of the suburbs? Will this be temporary or permanent? Was this already happening anyways?

 

Qui sed nesciunt alias commodi ut. Doloremque accusantium et aspernatur labore. Harum ea in ut quia voluptatem sed natus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”