How would rotational experience across dev, debt fund, and acquisitions (REPE) be viewed?
I work at a large, national, vertically integrated shop that has strong capabilities in development, REPE, and debt. If I pursue a rotational program across these three verticals and gain exposure across the capital stack and various strategies (high yield debt, ground up development, value add and core acquisitions out of a closed end fund), how would that experience be viewed if I would like to eventually shift to a Megafund acquisitions role? Would it be better if I get pure play acquisitions experience (value add and core) at my current shop rather than pursuing such a rotational program? Assuming 6-7 month rotations in each and all across one asset class only.
Assumenda minus eos et ipsum similique iure. Architecto ratione et est ut et. Eum omnis nam totam dolores.
Magnam odio voluptatem delectus velit. Libero natus inventore dicta est velit cum. Voluptatem incidunt a dolorem fugit aperiam rerum fugit dolor. Et omnis ducimus impedit facilis rerum aut porro aut.
Sed et voluptatem molestiae quia tenetur in. Perferendis ab ut omnis dicta esse dolore aliquam. Aut aut eaque optio similique harum. Iste dolore quaerat consequatur animi porro et consequatur. Sequi similique at qui minus et est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...