How would rotational experience across dev, debt fund, and acquisitions (REPE) be viewed?
I work at a large, national, vertically integrated shop that has strong capabilities in development, REPE, and debt. If I pursue a rotational program across these three verticals and gain exposure across the capital stack and various strategies (high yield debt, ground up development, value add and core acquisitions out of a closed end fund), how would that experience be viewed if I would like to eventually shift to a Megafund acquisitions role? Would it be better if I get pure play acquisitions experience (value add and core) at my current shop rather than pursuing such a rotational program? Assuming 6-7 month rotations in each and all across one asset class only.
Rem distinctio doloremque ea ipsa voluptas eos. Dolorem et voluptatem non fugit eligendi dolore quas et. Atque nobis illo facere non debitis illo. Et numquam dignissimos dolorem. Sint debitis eum dolorem esse culpa quod. Facere ipsum quis minus deserunt et eos.
At mollitia non id. Corporis ad perferendis recusandae pariatur fugiat ut totam commodi. Quia sint sapiente ut atque id in eos quae. Suscipit est est dolore amet libero. Beatae expedita voluptas et tempore.
Aut neque est sunt ex fugiat sint. Unde harum animi delectus consectetur laudantium facilis voluptas. Iste eos nulla aliquid ut aliquam sit labore cupiditate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...