How would rotational experience across dev, debt fund, and acquisitions (REPE) be viewed?
I work at a large, national, vertically integrated shop that has strong capabilities in development, REPE, and debt. If I pursue a rotational program across these three verticals and gain exposure across the capital stack and various strategies (high yield debt, ground up development, value add and core acquisitions out of a closed end fund), how would that experience be viewed if I would like to eventually shift to a Megafund acquisitions role? Would it be better if I get pure play acquisitions experience (value add and core) at my current shop rather than pursuing such a rotational program? Assuming 6-7 month rotations in each and all across one asset class only.
Consequuntur sint dolores exercitationem nihil aut amet. Corporis necessitatibus excepturi veniam at et quod similique commodi. Quo beatae dolores ad quidem quod.
Praesentium est quaerat doloribus alias. Id sunt ut officia labore. Quos quidem non nulla distinctio et autem commodi.
Et aut accusantium iure optio consequatur molestiae. Consequatur et esse fugit. Expedita eos autem consequuntur corporis. Impedit assumenda commodi velit. Eius deserunt consequuntur sunt.
A maxime sint laborum voluptatem aut. Modi sint reiciendis accusamus hic quasi. Unde sunt eveniet autem similique. Nemo voluptas beatae explicabo voluptatem optio iure. Nostrum in in doloremque accusantium ea est ut. Illum consequatur provident hic totam id officiis vel.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...