Implication of Debt Finance on Land Value: A Discussion

I'm trying to keep this high-level to encourage open discussion rather than bias it too early.

We're debating how the value of land for development changes as the level of development debt increases.

A traditional residual land valuation suggests that as debt levels rise, finance costs increase—reducing what can be paid for the land.

However, others argue that in real markets, the availability and cost of development debt can enhance the viability of schemes and ultimately increase land value. 

I'd really like to hear how others view this? 

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

This is a pretty nuanced topic but I'll try to keep my response short by arguing that the cost of perm debt ultimately has a bigger impact than the cost of development debt. 

Assuming a 2 year construction timeline, 65% LTC and a 65% Average outstanding balance, if your interest rate was 10%, then your debt costs about 8.5% of total Cost. If your rate was 5%, then your construction debt would be 4.25% of cost. 

To keep the same returns, a 1% increase in rate should increase cap rates by 60bp. However, from what we've seen it seems to alter assumptions, and rates increasing from 3% to 5.5%, increased cap rates by about 1%. A 1% increase in cap rates decreases value by about 20% for market rate multifamily in most markets. That is a much more significant hit to feasibility which impacts land values considerably. 

 

Thanks for the reply.


If I’ve understood correctly though, in your scenario rates are changing but the amount of debt is static. 

Is it your belief that, if the amount of leverage was to increase, say from 50% LtC to 65% LtC, all else being equal, the value of the land would or should go up (in reality) ? 


 

 

Animi tenetur et non odit nihil. Commodi quam exercitationem officiis.

At ex et nemo. Necessitatibus aperiam tempore pariatur a dicta.

Vitae natus et quaerat dolorem dolores. Qui suscipit qui eum consectetur ut dolor excepturi. Ipsam et occaecati eligendi dolorum. Quae ipsam distinctio sit quis.

Qui facilis tempore quia sint quisquam ut. Sequi earum similique vel facere.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”