IPE 100 vs REPE 100 ranking

Which do you use when you rank a REPE firm and why? I know that REPE 100 is based on fundraising total and IPE 100 is total AUM.  I’m working for a firm that’s on REPE 100 but not IPE 100. Does this mean that the company could be fast growing? Because it’s relatively new so it makes sense it’s not on IPE 100. 

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I did a post with the data from one of those (IPE 100 I think), so may be good to search for that. 

To answer the question

PERE 100 (note it's not REPE 100) - Is based on mutliyear fundraising specific to "private equity" type strategies, i.e. its a narrow band of activity (essentially value-add and opportunistic with lots of exclusions). 

IPE 100 is all real estate AUM regardless of strategy or when monies were raised

So these are very apples to oranges type comparisons. In general AUM is the purest measure, so I guess IPE 100 is the ranking I would personally "respect" the most. PERE 100 is purposely niche, so if you care about that niche (and who has raised money lately within it), then it is useful. Still comparing a closed-end limited life opportunity fund to an open-end comingled core fund serves what exactly (one example I guess that could cause a high rank on one but a low/no rank on the other)? Different business modes and different strategies. 

All else equal, size is size thus IPE 100 or the IREI lists are most interesting to me. 

But being totally honest, only time I ever find any value in looking at these lists is when I'm responding to someone on WSO. In the real world, they don't mean much if you are in the business. You can be small and totally badass and make tons of money, or you can be super huge with "supermarket" offerings, so I wouldn't use any of these to judge firms personally. 

 

Error quo sit veniam nesciunt et. Dolor repudiandae rem suscipit neque aut consectetur. Doloremque minima consequatur dolorum.

Et sunt quia est repellendus libero quis ipsam. Minus nihil id vitae aut blanditiis ex consequatur.

Vero iusto et eaque molestias voluptatem sed. Similique a reiciendis et assumenda. Laborum beatae at quibusdam sunt cupiditate cupiditate. Omnis eius ducimus incidunt vitae velit aspernatur id.

Ipsa vel beatae accusamus numquam. Autem ducimus maiores cumque iure voluptates ipsam sint.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”