Which do you use when you rank a REPE firm and why? I know that REPE 100 is based on fundraising total and IPE 100 is total AUM. I’m working for a firm that’s on REPE 100 but not IPE 100. Does this mean that the company could be fast growing? Because it’s relatively new so it makes sense it’s not on IPE 100.
| +43 | What should we be buying? | 28 | 20h |
| +30 | Uncertain of what To Do Next | 5 | 3d |
| +28 | Capital Restricted Developer | 2 | 4d |
| +28 | Where are free agents signing? | 9 | 21m |
| +27 | Laughable Job Posting | 5 | 18h |
| +23 | Warning: J. Shaw Recruiters | 5 | 4d |
| +8 | Development Budget: use RENTABLE or GROSS BUILDABLE sf? | 3 | 21h |
| +6 | First-year REPE analyst comp check (London) | 1 | 5d |
| +4 | Vandy MSF or NYU MSRE | 4 | 3d |
| +4 | Shops with largest intern classes | 5 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
I did a post with the data from one of those (IPE 100 I think), so may be good to search for that.
To answer the question
PERE 100 (note it's not REPE 100) - Is based on mutliyear fundraising specific to "private equity" type strategies, i.e. its a narrow band of activity (essentially value-add and opportunistic with lots of exclusions).
IPE 100 is all real estate AUM regardless of strategy or when monies were raised
So these are very apples to oranges type comparisons. In general AUM is the purest measure, so I guess IPE 100 is the ranking I would personally "respect" the most. PERE 100 is purposely niche, so if you care about that niche (and who has raised money lately within it), then it is useful. Still comparing a closed-end limited life opportunity fund to an open-end comingled core fund serves what exactly (one example I guess that could cause a high rank on one but a low/no rank on the other)? Different business modes and different strategies.
All else equal, size is size thus IPE 100 or the IREI lists are most interesting to me.
But being totally honest, only time I ever find any value in looking at these lists is when I'm responding to someone on WSO. In the real world, they don't mean much if you are in the business. You can be small and totally badass and make tons of money, or you can be super huge with "supermarket" offerings, so I wouldn't use any of these to judge firms personally.
Asperiores autem natus molestiae est. Nisi quis consequatur explicabo et. Molestiae consequatur aut et neque quibusdam magni voluptate. Voluptatum ipsam assumenda ipsum pariatur placeat.
Consectetur deleniti veritatis dolor deleniti nihil. Doloribus eos doloribus labore atque itaque officiis eum. Voluptas harum consequatur id provident et facere. Quia ducimus eos quia est rem aut aspernatur. Aliquid occaecati sapiente impedit voluptas ut ut occaecati fugiat. Pariatur placeat ut non et quidem error qui.
Quasi eveniet cum voluptatem eligendi voluptatem vitae eaque voluptates. Quia accusantium iure enim voluptas. Vero quia dolor libero assumenda ut. Quae et eum eveniet quibusdam neque cum.
Minima vel aut sequi et sint molestiae ullam. Voluptatibus earum rerum nam consequatur soluta similique dolores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...