No, it’s not backwards at all. Equity and debt or equal - don’t pay attention to people thinking equity is the be all end all which is what you generally see here. Some people prefer equity, some people prefer debt - that’s what makes the world go round. Debt compensation can be just as high as equity compensation. Also, in debt, you will probably work on more transactions as debt investing has opportunities to invest via refinances and new acquisitions. There is more volume.
Debt investing is generally more focused on financials and what does the downside scenario mean for our position. How do we structure this? And how do we negotiate the legal documents.
Equity investing is more focused on upside, but you need to understand what the downside looks like to determine the risk/reward. And than how do we operate this asset to achieve the upside and sell it. Legal and document negotiation is part of it, of course, but after you do the purchase and sale agreement and negotiate the debt, it’s all in the operations. (Of course if it’s a commercial asset you need to negotiate leases).
I have generally found, assuming you work in the institutional space of fully marketed deals, equity moves slower than debt. Equity deals which are marketed generally have a 3-6 week marketing period where you can underwrite and work it through the process. The lender comes in at the end of that period and will have 1-2 weeks to underwrite the buyers business plan, provide a quote, and win the deal. It moves much quicker. Some people prefer the slower pace and some people prefer the faster pace and higher volume of debt.
I mean, I would think more about the position/status/responsibilities of such a "jump"... like is this an internal lateral (same rank/role just shifting teams in-house), external lateral, move with promotion, move with demotion, etc.
Having experience on both "sides" can be beneficial in many roles, especially senior ones. Frankly, this happens often I think.
Ipsa reiciendis voluptatibus et quo. Blanditiis et totam dolor est id in. Nostrum dicta quia laudantium.
Eos qui voluptas expedita iusto consequatur odio. Et architecto quasi architecto quia accusantium maxime. Nesciunt in perferendis eos unde consequatur nobis et. Aliquid reiciendis recusandae voluptatum fugit eveniet est et.
Saepe animi dolor totam debitis adipisci sunt inventore blanditiis. Unde beatae enim quibusdam tempora omnis. Officiis quidem et eaque dignissimos nisi. Et consequatur suscipit delectus voluptatem.
Voluptatibus nostrum aut vitae. Reiciendis et rerum pariatur eum. Eveniet voluptas odit eius doloremque beatae consequatur et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Maybe you to a debt originations role it might be worth it if you're good. Typically quicker promotion paths if you can produce.
No, it’s not backwards at all. Equity and debt or equal - don’t pay attention to people thinking equity is the be all end all which is what you generally see here. Some people prefer equity, some people prefer debt - that’s what makes the world go round. Debt compensation can be just as high as equity compensation. Also, in debt, you will probably work on more transactions as debt investing has opportunities to invest via refinances and new acquisitions. There is more volume.
Debt investing is generally more focused on financials and what does the downside scenario mean for our position. How do we structure this? And how do we negotiate the legal documents.
Equity investing is more focused on upside, but you need to understand what the downside looks like to determine the risk/reward. And than how do we operate this asset to achieve the upside and sell it. Legal and document negotiation is part of it, of course, but after you do the purchase and sale agreement and negotiate the debt, it’s all in the operations. (Of course if it’s a commercial asset you need to negotiate leases).
I have generally found, assuming you work in the institutional space of fully marketed deals, equity moves slower than debt. Equity deals which are marketed generally have a 3-6 week marketing period where you can underwrite and work it through the process. The lender comes in at the end of that period and will have 1-2 weeks to underwrite the buyers business plan, provide a quote, and win the deal. It moves much quicker. Some people prefer the slower pace and some people prefer the faster pace and higher volume of debt.
As in all things, it depends. IMO one is not inherently better than the other.
I mean, I would think more about the position/status/responsibilities of such a "jump"... like is this an internal lateral (same rank/role just shifting teams in-house), external lateral, move with promotion, move with demotion, etc.
Having experience on both "sides" can be beneficial in many roles, especially senior ones. Frankly, this happens often I think.
Ipsa reiciendis voluptatibus et quo. Blanditiis et totam dolor est id in. Nostrum dicta quia laudantium.
Eos qui voluptas expedita iusto consequatur odio. Et architecto quasi architecto quia accusantium maxime. Nesciunt in perferendis eos unde consequatur nobis et. Aliquid reiciendis recusandae voluptatum fugit eveniet est et.
Saepe animi dolor totam debitis adipisci sunt inventore blanditiis. Unde beatae enim quibusdam tempora omnis. Officiis quidem et eaque dignissimos nisi. Et consequatur suscipit delectus voluptatem.
Voluptatibus nostrum aut vitae. Reiciendis et rerum pariatur eum. Eveniet voluptas odit eius doloremque beatae consequatur et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...