Multifamily Property Tax Projections

Hi all,

I had a question on underwriting projections on property taxes for certain states, which 1) do not have a maximum limit on the YoY increase in assessed value and/or 2) use a mass appraisal system that factors in all three market, income, and cost approaches.

In particular, I've had trouble justifying my assumptions for states like Florida and Texas. I've spoken to the appraisers, but it seems to depend case-by-case.

For example: Texas counties have a relatively high millage rate and the YoY has no cap, so I have been relying on the historical averages of prior years assuming the maximum assessment would be the purchase price. But the growth assumptions on larger deals tend to make or break the deal, or at least have a significant impact, in my underwriting. Is this just a judgment call I have to make?

Any suggestions on how to make these proforma assumptions? Please let me know if I can explain something more clearly.

Thanks.

3 Comments
 
Best Response

Depends jurisdiction by jurisdiction, as you've pointed out. At some point you have to phase to 100% of purchase price, it's a matter of how soon you do it. Is it over 3 years? Is it immediate?

Also, on the disposition side, are you assuming a real estate tax adjustment for the buyer? This clearly affects your exit price.

Unfortunately, you'll have to take a look at old comps and see how they were treated. This all assumes that the acquisition is in a market that you don't frequently do deals in. It's always best to have something in the portfolio that you acquired in the market and point towards previous experience. I believe most jurisdictions always have the right to assess a property at the most recent recorded sales price.

 

Nihil qui dolorem aut quos commodi et totam. Odio et at et accusamus libero non. Omnis labore fugit aspernatur omnis est sunt inventore.

Quos cumque culpa accusamus hic labore. Omnis explicabo dolores maxime quia ipsam. Occaecati et ut voluptates enim dolor iusto quis.

Ex et ratione doloremque impedit qui perspiciatis tempore. Repellendus quo autem possimus ex distinctio delectus. Quasi nisi eius commodi laborum expedita rerum iusto reprehenderit. In dolorem molestiae nostrum error aut aut doloremque.

Rerum labore id et. Rem expedita quo cupiditate illo quam. Illo ea facere atque neque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”