Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
| +38 | Where are free agents signing? | 19 | 6h |
| +33 | Capital Restricted Developer | 7 | 15h |
| +31 | Laughable Job Posting | 11 | 8h |
| +27 | What Is Your Backup Plan? | 15 | 7h |
| +24 | AvalonBay Equity Residential Merger discussion | 8 | 6h |
| +23 | Future of Real Estate | 5 | 7h |
| +16 | Extremely Slow Ramp Up | 1 | 20h |
| +14 | In RE, what is the ONE software tool you couldn’t survive without? | 5 | 19h |
| +9 | Development Budget: use RENTABLE or GROSS BUILDABLE sf? | 3 | 2d |
| +6 | Dynex | 4 | 17h |
Career Resources
As LP you shouldn’t be guaranteeing any completion or repayment. Sounds like the GP doesn’t have the balance sheet to support the deal. If the LP provided the guarantee I’d ask for compensation and or a promote.
I would think that the GP could give up something in the promote structure so that the LP will provide the guarantees- balancing upside with downside risk. If that isn't possible, I don't know how any new developers could do their first deals unless their families are rich.
Lots of ways to structure the guarantees. Typically you compensate the guarantor (can be anyone, GP entity, someone within GP who personally signs, LP, totally separate 3rd Party) with a fee and/or piece of the promote. There's no right or wrong way to do this, and it's one area where smaller developers need to get creative in order to get things done.
Ullam eius quod facilis iste recusandae. Minima iusto eum error libero sit. Quis earum eos error nihil molestias nulla eligendi. Ut eveniet et quas nesciunt reprehenderit omnis. Reiciendis voluptate id reiciendis et delectus sit aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...