Thoughts on institutional RE investment advisory roles — between the LP and GP?
Curious how people view the investment advisory / separate account roles at larger real estate investment managers like Heitman, PGIM, Clarion, Principal, Stockbridge, etc.
I’m referring to teams that advise and manage real estate investments on behalf of large institutional clients, such as public pension funds. You’re involved in investment decisions and portfolio/asset management, but you’re neither directly employed by the pension fund nor working for the operating partner executing the business plan.
How are these seats viewed from a long-term career standpoint? Seems like they could offer solid institutional exposure and experience evaluating investments, managing portfolios, and working with operators. But does sitting between the ultimate capital source and the operator limit your ownership of decisions or the skills you develop?
Would be interested in hearing from anyone who’s worked in one of these roles:
* How do compensation, progression, and exit opportunities compare with direct LP or GP roles?
* Do you develop meaningful investment judgment and execution experience?
* Is this an attractive long-term seat, or do people typically try to move closer to the capital or the real estate?
Trying to understand whether these are underrated career paths or whether there’s a real downside to being in that intermediary position.