Waterfall Model Help

I'm doing a take home case study that includes a waterfall model with 2 hurdles. 10/90 until 10% IRR 20/80 until 20% IRR 30/70 after 20% IRR

There is one large initial funding at time zero, and a handful of small capital calls in later months.

Everything looked good, and when I submitted the MD who's interviewing me he said it was good start, but said to revise and "assume that the Sponsor's original 10% co-invest is part of the LP's tranche in the waterfall."

The only thing I could make this out to mean is to take the initial funding and attribute it all to the LP, leaving the LP with a crazy disproportionate share of the equity invested (the GP would now only contribute 10% of the later capital calls), but keeping the distributions the same, resulting in a wildly high IRR and Equity multiple for the GP.

Is there any other way I could interpret his comment?

Can attach version of the model if needed. EDIT: Models Attached. #1 is model before his comments, #2 is the changes I made in response to his comments

Attachment Size
pre comments 119.23 KB 119.23 KB
post comments 119.45 KB 119.45 KB
8 Comments
 

what he is saying is that the “80/20” and “70/30” are promotes, and not splits. so the promotes are based off the members pro rata interests.

so, a 20% promote on a 90/10 is 80% * 90% = 72% to the LP and 28% to the sponsor.

 

Rerum et ducimus numquam adipisci. Saepe eveniet eius voluptatum ullam dolorum dolor numquam. Minima neque pariatur nihil quod harum et ut veniam. Perspiciatis voluptas et veritatis modi ea eum voluptas. Et voluptas sunt et qui fuga.

Ipsa eius aut officia voluptatem dolore exercitationem. Aliquid qui minus dolorem odio tempore. Dignissimos laborum odio reiciendis aperiam et dolorem incidunt. Et occaecati dolorum sint. Nihil enim hic qui sit harum maxime nostrum.

Voluptatibus ut qui at praesentium eaque nisi qui. Ex occaecati consequatur voluptas consectetur. Quia sequi eligendi eius sed voluptatem est architecto.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”