Berkeley EECS, CMU Tepper, UNC Kenan-Flagler (Assured Admit), or IU Kelley for Investment Banking?

Hey everyone,

I'm a high school senior trying to decide between UC Berkeley EECS (College of Engineering), CMU Tepper, UNC Kenan-Flagler (Assured Admit Program), and IU Kelley. My goal is specifically to break into investment banking after graduation (ideally NYC IB).

I'd really appreciate any insights you might have regarding these three schools for IB recruiting:

* Berkeley EECS: How realistic is it for EECS majors to pivot into IB? Do banks recruit EECS undergrads directly, or would I struggle without a finance/business background?

* CMU Tepper: Is Tepper considered a strong target or semi-target for NYC IB? How effective are their finance clubs, alumni connections, and on-campus recruiting?

* UNC Kenan-Flagler (Assured Admit): I've heard it's a strong semi-target, especially for Charlotte IB, but how difficult is it realistically to land a top-tier IB role in NYC from here? Does the Assured Admit Program provide significant advantages once on campus?

* IU Kelley: I've heard some great things about the IB workshop and their strong placements, but would it realistically compare well to the other schools on this list for NYC IB recruiting?

I'd greatly appreciate any perspectives or experiences. Thanks so much in advance!

8 Comments
 

For breaking into NYC investment banking, here's how the schools stack up based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. UNC Kenan-Flagler (Assured Admit):

    • UNC Kenan-Flagler is a strong semi-target for IB, particularly for Charlotte offices, but it also has solid placement into NYC IB roles.
    • The Assured Admit Program gives you a significant advantage by guaranteeing access to the business school and its resources from day one, which is crucial for networking and preparing for IB recruiting.
    • On-campus recruiting (OCR) is strong, with alumni connections at major banks like JPM, GS, and MS. However, it may require more effort compared to top-tier target schools to secure NYC roles.
  2. IU Kelley:

    • Kelley’s Investment Banking Workshop is a standout feature, placing ~80 students annually into top IB roles, including bulge brackets (BBs) and elite boutiques (EBs).
    • Kelley is ranked as the #13 feeder into Wall Street jobs nationally and #3 among public universities, making it a strong contender for IB recruiting.
    • However, success heavily depends on gaining admission to the IB Workshop and leveraging its network. Without it, Kelley’s placement power diminishes significantly.
  3. CMU Tepper:

    • Tepper is considered a semi-target for NYC IB. While it has a strong quantitative and analytical reputation, its finance program and alumni network are not as robust as some other schools on this list.
    • Tepper’s finance clubs and career services can help, but you may need to put in extra effort to stand out in IB recruiting compared to peers from stronger target schools.
  4. UC Berkeley EECS:

    • Berkeley EECS is not a traditional feeder for IB, as it’s more aligned with tech and engineering roles. However, its prestige and rigorous curriculum can make you an attractive candidate for quantitative or tech-focused roles within IB (e.g., tech M&A or quant trading).
    • Pivoting into IB from EECS would require significant self-initiative, such as joining finance clubs, networking extensively, and possibly pursuing internships in finance early on. Banks do recruit from Berkeley, but primarily from Haas (business school) rather than EECS.

Recommendation:

  • If your primary goal is NYC IB, UNC Kenan-Flagler (Assured Admit) and IU Kelley (with IB Workshop) are your best bets. UNC offers a broader semi-target reputation, while Kelley’s IB Workshop provides a focused pipeline for IB roles.
  • CMU Tepper is a decent option but slightly less competitive for IB compared to UNC and Kelley.
  • Berkeley EECS is the least aligned with your IB goals, though it could work if you’re open to a more unconventional path or tech-focused roles in finance.

Ultimately, your decision should also factor in personal preferences, costs, and your confidence in leveraging the specific resources each school offers.

Sources: IU Kelley Prestige, Are These Good Schools for NYC Investment Banking?, Georgetown MSB vs Michigan Ross vs UC Berkeley, Comprehensive List of Target Schools for Investment Banking, The Comprehensive List of Transfer Friendly Schools For Investment Banking

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

The bot's CMU description is pretty accurate. There are good finance clubs and a strong major program, but the alumni network is on the weaker side, and the number of placements is low compared to our peers, considering our ranking (still some quality placements). The one benefit that CMU will offer is that it is very easy to register for a double major (say you want to do business and engineering/cs), unlike the state schools (I've heard they are quite restrictive with moving colleges). The double major @ CMU will be challenging, but you can do it nonetheless. 

 

Thanks so much for sharing this. 

Given what you mentioned about CMU's lower placement numbers compared to peer schools, do you feel like most CMU students who seriously pursue IB still end up with strong opportunities, or is it a noticeably tougher process overall?

Also, you brought up the double-major flexibility at CMU (business & engineering/cs), which sounds interesting - do you think this significantly boosts recruiting for IB roles, or would banks primarily focus on the business side of a double major anyway?

Lastly, for someone who's seriously motivated and willing to put in all the effort, do you have any thoughts on how CMU Tepper might compare overall for breaking into IB against Berkeley EECS, UNC Kenan-Flagler, or IU Kelley?

Thanks again, this is super helpful!

 

Don't go to tepper. Everyone is depressed from what I hear. IU IBW is strong, but you have to get in. There is also the seminar if you don't get in but placement drops. I personally would choose UNC based on your list. Fun school. 

 

do you feel like most CMU students who seriously pursue IB still end up with strong opportunities, or is it a noticeably tougher process overall?

Think about it this way. No alumni network for specific companies/groups makes it difficult to network with those teams to get placed there directly. We have strong IB clubs and great-quality students, but IB is definitely on the weaker side when compared to other schools (even if they are ranked below us!). 

IB was never a factor in my school decision, so I don't really know anything specific about the EECS, UNC, or IU - but even after all the negatives I bring about CMU, if you work hard enough and in the top 10% of the students, you will end up somewhere amazing.

I like where I'm at a lot. It's allowed me to major in CS and business, which are my two passionate academic interests. In terms of depression (once again, I don't really know this too well since I can't truly compare), it can occasionally be difficult (esp with two majors minors/lots of difficult courses), but everyone is so interested, smart, and quirky in their own thing that I find it to be extremely rewarding.  

 
Most Helpful

EECS and it's not even close. You have a strong shot for TMT groups in SF and NYC as well. Just make sure you apply to all the finance/consulting RSOs as soon as you get to campus to make it clear to recruiters that you are interested in pursuing a career in finance not tech. I know plenty of people in your shoes who all landed great seats. This is assuming you are smart enough to do well in the EECS program which I'm assuming given that you intentionally applied to it

 

Eum id et delectus. Et omnis excepturi eaque nesciunt. Eligendi vero qui asperiores beatae et tempore molestiae officia. Sed consequatur officiis sint placeat optio.

Fugiat voluptatem excepturi soluta incidunt cupiditate natus nobis. Id et sunt asperiores fugiat mollitia nemo qui.

Perspiciatis et veritatis earum magni tempora. Corrupti aliquid iusto sint accusantium incidunt praesentium assumenda odio. Odio animi nam soluta modi saepe. Culpa voluptatem dolor et perferendis beatae et quasi est. Laboriosam in culpa iste earum itaque eum ea veniam. Autem dolor aspernatur veniam et. Officia ipsam deserunt totam pariatur ipsa reiciendis quod est.

Quia culpa blanditiis libero ut consectetur iure facilis. Optio provident id esse voluptatibus accusantium a. Possimus quo asperiores sit sit exercitationem veritatis. Ut at quia eveniet placeat reprehenderit ratione sit. Ut quo fuga maiores eligendi ipsam qui aliquid.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”