Booth vs Kellogg
Which one is better for PE recruiting? Is it worth going to either as a platform to continue a PE career or not worth it if it’s not HSW?
Trending Content - Business School and GMAT Forum
Career Resources
Booth easily has the better PE program purely due to being more financed focus. That being said, MFPE is not happening. Have seen UMM. Tbh I would leverage the Booth name to land a MM that is rapidly growing. I truly believe VP seats at those MM are the best seats to be in. And that is absolutely doable from Booth.
Any examples of these funds?
I would look at the team pages of Chi PE firms (see below link for a decent list).
Overall, it depends on the firm, but both schools are well-represented across MM PE in Chicago. Some firms have more Kellogg people (Waud, Water Street, Shore Capital) and other firms have more Booth people (Vistria, Pritzker, Wynnchurch).
Some firms (MDP, GTCR, Linden) seem to favor HSW, but even those firms have a few Booth / Kellogg people.
https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/chicago-pe-firms-c…
Dolore ratione nihil laborum et quaerat. Omnis omnis omnis ipsam aut cum odio. Ut qui aut esse.
Consequuntur dicta ea est reiciendis temporibus perspiciatis. Amet consequatur eum officiis. Aliquam eligendi sit ut omnis cupiditate. Totam libero ducimus in sed voluptates tempora et. Quia occaecati provident distinctio dolorem est.
Temporibus alias qui vitae alias voluptates libero facilis. Commodi ipsam optio reprehenderit enim harum beatae vitae ea. Minus deserunt vitae aut in aut. Fugiat accusantium reiciendis minus non ut quae. Molestiae sed dolorem placeat repudiandae.
Nam illum rerum eos voluptas. Libero ut sint iste. Voluptas neque doloremque in eaque harum. Odit omnis nam quae rerum error. Vero quas atque perferendis possimus velit atque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...