Does anyone else think that the new FT ranking is a joke?

The methodology of the latest Masters in Finance ranking does not make much sense to me. Here is a list of the criteria which I think are irrelevant in judging the quality of the programme, which together weigh as much as 44%: Weights for the ranking criteria are shown below in brackets — (pre-experience) [post-experience] — as a percentage of the overall ranking.

Female faculty % (5) 5: percentage of female faculty.

Female students % (5) 5: percentage of female students on the masters.

Women on board % (1) 1: percentage of women on the school advisory board.

International faculty % (5) 5: calculated according to faculty diversity by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from their country of employment (published figure).

International students % (5) 5: calculated according to the diversity of current students by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from their country of study.

International board % (1) 1: percentage of the board whose citizenship differs from the school’s home country.

International mobility (8) 8: based on alumni citizenship and the countries where they worked before their masters, on graduation and three years after graduation.†

International course experience (8) 8: calculated according to whether the most recent graduating masters class completed exchanges, attended short classes or study tours, or had company internships in countries other than where the school is based.*

Extra languages (1) N/A: The figure shows the number of languages required for graduation minus the number required for entry. For example, if a school requires two languages on entry and two on graduation, the figure is zero.

For gender-related criteria, schools with 50:50 male/female composition receive the highest possible score.

2 Comments
 

Itaque sit nemo incidunt optio eos autem recusandae. Omnis est voluptatibus iusto hic fuga consequatur ea. Reprehenderit voluptates minus sit omnis soluta molestiae minus ab.

Nostrum tenetur aut est non. Impedit dolor quia rem cumque voluptas soluta. Et rerum sequi rerum dolor. Et animi quo quidem vel. Id voluptas qui consequatur dolorem culpa odit eos. Consectetur laborum architecto error voluptatem ut id sunt. Et voluptatem voluptas ipsam voluptatum laudantium.

Sunt ea perspiciatis tenetur autem soluta. In quod cumque voluptates. Modi qui eos molestiae velit est. Sit sed aut id dignissimos consectetur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”