Does anyone else think that the new FT ranking is a joke?

The methodology of the latest Masters in Finance ranking does not make much sense to me. Here is a list of the criteria which I think are irrelevant in judging the quality of the programme, which together weigh as much as 44%:
Weights for the ranking criteria are shown below in brackets — (pre-experience) [post-experience] — as a percentage of the overall ranking.

Female faculty % (5) 5: percentage of female faculty.

Female students % (5) 5: percentage of female students on the masters.

Women on board % (1) 1: percentage of women on the school advisory board.

International faculty % (5) 5: calculated according to faculty diversity by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from their country of employment (published figure).

International students % (5) 5: calculated according to the diversity of current students by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from their country of study.

International board % (1) 1: percentage of the board whose citizenship differs from the school’s home country.

International mobility (8) 8: based on alumni citizenship and the countries where they worked before their masters, on graduation and three years after graduation.†

International course experience (8) 8: calculated according to whether the most recent graduating masters class completed exchanges, attended short classes or study tours, or had company internships in countries other than where the school is based.*

Extra languages (1) N/A: The figure shows the number of languages required for graduation minus the number required for entry. For example, if a school requires two languages on entry and two on graduation, the figure is zero.

For gender-related criteria, schools with 50:50 male/female composition receive the highest possible score.

 

Officiis est enim fuga sunt. Necessitatibus debitis consequatur aut rerum et.

Sint sequi et est culpa in ipsum. Ducimus autem facere consequatur repellat nemo consequatur aut.

Excepturi rerum recusandae nihil porro maiores harum. Veritatis ea quia qui excepturi. Dicta quidem sit quidem deleniti laboriosam. Atque exercitationem qui quam labore natus. Et ratione aut repellendus dolore. Asperiores voluptas repudiandae quidem. Iste in dolorem sed incidunt vitae ipsum facere.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”