GMAT Raw Scores vs. Combined Score

I was curious how much the raw scores for verbal and quant matter vs. the overall score for top MBA programs. For example, today I took the GMAT to see where I was at and got a 730 with a 47 in quant (78%) and 44 in verbal (98% I think), which is exactly the opposite of what I would have expected because I've always been much stronger in math. Although, I kinda fucked up in math by running out of time and having to guess on the last 4-5. Still, that's a pretty big difference in percentile. Would it be worth it to take it again to get my quant up even if my verbal drops a bit (I think I got pretty lucky with verbal) or do MBA programs more care about the total score? I also will graduate with a masters in electrical engineering this year from a top 20 engineering program so I figured MBA programs would assume I am okay with any math or quantitative material. Any input is appreciated.

7 Comments
 
Best Response

The thing about the math section is that since a bunch of engineers and math asians take the GMAT, the math scores do not follow a regular distribution. Instead the top 20% of scores are all clumped together in the 47-52 raw score range.

To be more specific:

Apparently, anything higher than a 52 raw score on the math section is unheard of, so let's make this our 100% score. With a normal distribution, your score of 47 would easily be in the 90% range. However, due to the high number of quant-focused people taking the exam, a 47 is pushed down into the 78-80% range.

I think all the MBA programs know this, and a 47 should be good enough to convince them that you can handle the quantitative aspects of their courses. (The idea that any MBA course is overly quantitative is a joke to begin with, of course; it's not like you'll be learning financial engineering)

If you feel like you can score above a 47 on the Math than by all means re-take it, but keep in mind that a 730 is good enough for any program and you don't want your verbal score to suffer.

 

If you take a class like manhattan gmat, they'll build diagrams where you can plot raw scores to get a sense of where you fall. pm for more info.

 

Thanks for the input. I start a two year rotational program this summer doing application development (aka writing code) for a NYC bank so I'll probably apply for business school after that. I was just curious how much admission directors look into the break down of raw scores. I knew I didn't do as well on quant as I could have but still was surprised at the low percentile and was equally as shocked at the high verbal percentile ranking. Looks like I should be alright though with an engineering undergrad +grad degree.

To what affirmative action mentioned: That makes sense about the quant scores being scewed towards the high end, but I think the opposite occurs for the verbal section. I'm assuming a lot of the foreign students who do really well in math (the kids in my EE classes) also struggle mightily with the sentence correction questions. Just my personal experience after working with many foreign students in engineering classes.

 

Eveniet rerum ea molestiae quae. Illum illum occaecati voluptatem error. Consequuntur iure eligendi quidem in. Earum tempora aperiam illo sint voluptatem qui cum. Debitis consequuntur accusamus laudantium fugiat deserunt blanditiis. Velit numquam sequi corporis tempore vitae. Odit omnis officia perferendis ad excepturi illum voluptas.

Quam incidunt quis modi quam quisquam quia amet culpa. Amet iure voluptatem veritatis tempore iste ratione debitis ullam. Expedita quia architecto fuga rerum. Vitae quia ducimus quia voluptatem. Rerum omnis quae quasi quia tempore ipsam. Tenetur atque suscipit explicabo nihil alias adipisci.

Aperiam velit consequatur dolore veritatis rem sit. Quia ratione debitis voluptatem labore et non voluptatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”