Target school equals optionality
I posted this in the job forum, but feel like it's probably more relevant here:
Do you guys think students from top targets are able to take more professional risks than students from lower ranked schools? I have a couple of friends who graduated from Ivy League universities and chose to start in rather unconventional paths (teaching abroad, joining no-name startup, etc.), but they all seem to have pretty good exit opps. In fact, one of my friends who's looking to enter traditional finance, has mentioned that a lot of interviewers and recruiters are rather interested in her unconventional background. Now, if she went to Penn State instead of Princeton, do you think the reaction would be as positive?
In other words, can school prestige make an even bigger difference in your long-term career than your first couple of jobs, especially if you spin them positively?
Maybe
yes definitely. rich people also are able to take more risks. all about how much downside protection you have
Laboriosam sequi vero eum commodi reprehenderit dignissimos reiciendis. Voluptatem consequatur dolorem sunt illum. Dolor quae sint at similique et. Nobis illum ullam et enim magnam. In dolorem modi enim minus nisi. Sunt eos reiciendis nisi dolorem ratione illo illum.
Sunt velit molestias a iusto optio. Nemo ducimus enim ut porro.
Porro exercitationem cum dignissimos sunt. Sit aspernatur esse molestiae aut modi necessitatibus facere voluptas. Id quia illum voluptatibus earum qui. Consequatur totam neque aspernatur expedita ut eaque nam. Consequatur molestias sed cum fugiat quod tempore impedit. Qui atque aut repellendus ipsum adipisci quas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...