The Word ‘Man’ Is Banned At Princeton University

Students won't be punished for using it, but the world "man" is being removed from courses and school activities, being replaced by more gender-neutral terms.

Some may see this as an Orwellian side-step, unnecessarily blocking or destroying a useful term for the sake of political correctness. Others see it as a necessary state of evolution. Why, of course, do we use the word "man" to describe one gender and "wo-man" to describe the other. What's with the prefix? "Male" and "Fe-male" does the same thing. Seems like these words were created by men.

Using the words "man" and "woman" is still tolerated at Princeton and can still be used to identify gender, but the insidious imposition of the "man" term will be altered.

A memo from the school read “consistent with style guidelines issued by Princeton’s Office of Human Resources and Office of Communications, and as endorsed by the Institutional Equity Planning Group as a preferred University practice, HR has developed these gender inclusive style guidelines, to be utilized by all HR staff members in HR communications, policies, job descriptions, and job postings."

John Cramer, Princeton’s director of media relations, said the guidelines “reflect the university’s initiative of fostering an inclusive environment.”

https://www.minds.com/blog/view/614516170636140559

Ever heard of political correctness gone mad? Because this is clearly another case.

Now, studying at Princepton isn't exactly cheap either. Considering this is the prevalent line of thought these days in most Ivy League colleges, is it worthy the price? Yes the name on the resume, yes the connections. However shouldn't we start to question the quality of education provided?

8 Comments
 

And when you think that all this gender business started in 2013 - 2014 on the internet. The same way Trump is going to win because of the media.

 
"Name Of Profit"

And when you think that all this gender business started in 2013 - 2014 on the internet. The same way Trump is going to win because of the media.

Actually, it comes from a branch of feminism called ''intersectionality'', which goes back to the 70s and it could be summed up with ''everything done by the white man is evil''. However it has always been a fringe thing until recently, then for some reason it started going mainstream and took over the whole feminism movement.

If it was just feminazis, I wouldn't care. But the fact that the Insitutional Equity Planning Group endorsed it troubles me. Basically all the buzzward terms like diversity, inclusiveness etc. are becoming a synonym of ''white males are bad''. Then of course they get mad and vote Trump.

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 
Best Response

It's not as bad as it sounds from the headline. It most specifically pertains to written communications and especially those relating to job postings. So, get rid of things like mailman and write postal worker instead. They're not saying nobody can say the word 'man' anymore. I'm sure you read the article and know that though.

Does it go too far? Probably. Is it better to use terms like flight attendant instead of stewardess? Probably so as well.

Who gives a shit either way?

 

Dolores iste dolorem mollitia laborum et molestiae consequatur. Ipsam eum minima quaerat dolorum reprehenderit expedita. Rem tempora ex quaerat totam. Laboriosam sed eligendi sunt consequatur alias.

A et sapiente impedit aut dolorum error in. Quidem repellat nam natus qui id. Odit aliquam et inventore optio ex totam excepturi dolores. Et qui ipsa natus impedit praesentium quo.

Ut vel eum dolor eligendi sequi mollitia. Sint voluptatem minus velit quia. Fugit voluptas aut ut et occaecati velit. Architecto beatae maiores aut laboriosam porro ipsa. Enim iusto quaerat itaque itaque.

 

Quis dolores cum minus sapiente tenetur itaque. Omnis aspernatur beatae necessitatibus soluta perferendis nobis. Sequi at consequuntur deleniti aut vitae mollitia velit. Voluptatem quia reiciendis quo voluptatem sit maiores ut.

Vitae eligendi est et nesciunt quia nobis. Mollitia at ratione similique et illo id. Recusandae ratione ut enim voluptas. Occaecati eius est vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”