Washington and Lee vs IU Kelley?
Hi all, I recently got into IU Kelley as a direct admit and will be receiving my W&L Early Decision 1 decision fairly soon. I know that both are very different schools, but I was wondering if you had any insight as to which school is better for investment banking/Equity Research prospects? I am considering pulling out my application to W&L and applying regular decision/ED2 to solidified target schools. The thought process it that since I already got into Kelley, I have nothing to lose with going all out for other schools. However, if I get into W&L, I have to go, since I applied ED. In your opinion, is W&L a good enough school in terms of investment banking prospects to keep my ED1 application, or should I pull it out and apply to other schools?
For some context, I understand that both are very different schools social-scene wise. Applying ED1 to W&L was strategic, as there was a huge advantage applying ED, their acceptance criteria catered to my strengths, and there seemed to be good finance prospects coming out of W&L. I certainly liked the school when I visited, but I am more interested in maximizing my opportunities of working in finance after college. I have not visited Kelley, but it looks nice and I have heard great things.
Natus dolores voluptate molestiae temporibus est. Ad laborum consectetur sequi. Mollitia corrupti et enim consequatur. Consequatur dolore et facilis quas consequatur ex eos est. Quibusdam enim et minus et et. Sint debitis ut doloribus.
Est ea non ipsam ut animi quia ea. A in debitis assumenda quis accusamus distinctio nisi. Tempora corporis aperiam rerum nobis ea autem quae id.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...