10 Comments
 

I found this one: Zapranis et al. (2012), Identifying and evaluating horizontal support and resistance levels: an empirical study on US stock markets I didn't know there was a way of measuring them though.. I thought you just looked at the chart and guessed approximately based on previous levels

 
PancakesI found this one: Zapranis et al. (2012), Identifying and evaluating horizontal support and resistance levels: an empirical study on US stock markets I didn't know there was a way of measuring them though.. I thought you just looked at the chart and guessed approximately based on previous levels

Tried taking a look at the article couldn't couldn't open it though... maybe its on Jstor

 

I've never heard of a quant performing technical analysis.

"My caddie's chauffeur informs me that a bank is a place where people put money that isn't properly invested."
 
mikesswimnI've never heard of a quant performing technical analysis.

Paper titled: "AUTOMATED TRADING WITH BOOSTING AND EXPERT WEIGHTING" (I can't post links yet so just google it)

They use "simple and exponential moving average, Bollinger bands, acceleration, momentum, rate of change, moving average convergence divergence, relative strength index, stochastic oscillators, Williams indicator, money flow index, on balance volume, accumulation/distribution line, Chaikin oscillator, negative and positive volume index, and price-volume trend" with several more quanty layers on top.

 
zacharydavid
mikesswimnI've never heard of a quant performing technical analysis.

Paper titled: "AUTOMATED TRADING WITH BOOSTING AND EXPERT WEIGHTING" (I can't post links yet so just google it)

They use "simple and exponential moving average, Bollinger bands, acceleration, momentum, rate of change, moving average convergence divergence, relative strength index, stochastic oscillators, Williams indicator, money flow index, on balance volume, accumulation/distribution line, Chaikin oscillator, negative and positive volume index, and price-volume trend" with several more quanty layers on top.

Very cool paper! Thanks for giving me the heads up. I love reading up on this sort of thing.

That being said, come on man, this is hardly an example of quants utilizing technical analysis. This is a ridiculously sophisticated trading system. Technical analysis is used as the method of "learning" of the different agents developed within the system. This is as much "technical analysis" as it is "addition & multiplication," both are present within the system, but to refer to it in it's entirety as either would be silly.

Still though, thanks for the heads up on the research!

"My caddie's chauffeur informs me that a bank is a place where people put money that isn't properly invested."
 

Quant trading is extremely diverse, and while technical analysis doesn't usually have much presence in a quant trader's arsenal, there are several quant trading strategies that rely heavily on systematic technical analysis techniques that are automated. Of course, by this I am not suggesting that connecting two points across a screen, or a variant thereof, can give you an edge over multi-billion dollar funds employing PhDs in a range of technical disciplines.

This is by far one of the most interesting papers I've read on the subject matter: http://web.mit.edu/wangj/www/pap/LoMamayskyWang00.pdf

With regards to support/ resistance and pivot point based quant strategies, Crabel Capital Management, a prominent quantitative fund founded by ex-Niederhoffer trader Toby Crabel, uses those techniques extensively.

I personally find most of this support, resistance, pivot points, double top, head and shoulders, crouching tiger hidden hidden dragon garbage useless, primarily because it is extremely difficult to rigorously test such patterns that are founded on perception.

 
Macro ArbitrageQuant trading is extremely diverse, and while technical analysis doesn't usually have much presence in a quant trader's arsenal, there are several quant trading strategies that rely heavily on systematic technical analysis techniques that are automated. Of course, by this I am not suggesting that connecting two points across a screen, or a variant thereof, can give you an edge over multi-billion dollar funds employing PhDs in a range of technical disciplines.

This is by far one of the most interesting papers I've read on the subject matter: http://web.mit.edu/wangj/www/pap/LoMamayskyWang00.pdf

With regards to support/ resistance and pivot point based quant strategies, Crabel Capital Management, a prominent quantitative fund founded by ex-Niederhoffer trader Toby Crabel, uses those techniques extensively.

I personally find most of this support, resistance, pivot points, double top, head and shoulders, crouching tiger hidden hidden dragon garbage useless, primarily because it is extremely difficult to rigorously test such patterns that are founded on perception.

Thanks for sharing this paper Macro. I had a prof who was madly in love with Andrew Lo and Technical Analysis lol. Still need to read a nonrandom walk down wall street at some point

In regards to market dynamics though, generally once price falls into a certain range intraday, momentum/volume dissipates until the beginning of the next move. I was wondering what kind of tools quants may use to determine the probability of the next move up or down or is it anyone's guess intraday since there is so much noise in the data...?

 
Best Response

In similique quis id doloremque. Vero possimus dolor qui vero autem. Deserunt eum dolores sit quia voluptatem. Et delectus distinctio quis. Aut ipsa error reprehenderit quo. Voluptas ullam magni itaque neque nihil aperiam dolore. Quae tenetur tenetur modi aut vitae quia voluptatem.

Sed neque ipsam maiores voluptatem amet. Eum illo rem voluptates ut perspiciatis amet itaque. Fugiat ab hic impedit sed ut fugiat.

Iure dolores dicta iure aut quasi assumenda incidunt. Amet eum unde pariatur molestias sit ipsam esse. Porro ut omnis dignissimos nostrum perferendis provident.

Qui modi explicabo aut sunt. Officiis molestiae ut excepturi nemo. Expedita ipsum impedit harum alias. Occaecati mollitia corporis est ut. Minus atque quia magni dolor ab occaecati quia. Doloribus laboriosam quia eaque quia saepe dolores quaerat. Non unde voluptatem blanditiis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”