How accurate are these figures at top shops like Jane street, Sig, DE Shaw, and Two Sigma? It feels like the article is written by a Jane street trader, but the 1000000 dollar average seems high.
| +14 | Natural Gas Analyst Path to Trader | 2 | 17h |
| +12 | RBC S&T 27' | 15 | 1d |
| +9 | CRE to S&T lateral opportunities | 5 | 16h |
| +6 | Exiting Sell Side FI Trading | 1 | 2d |
| +6 | S&T Outlook and Pivot from Buy Side | 1 | 1d |
| +6 | EM Resources / Study Material | 0 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Note they provided more descriptive statistics. Estimated median pay of 250-700 and mean of 1mm+. I think these numbers aren't too far off the mark, though perhaps a bit high. For every person making 2mm, you'll have two making 500k to come up with that mean number. If you make it, whichever half of the spectrum you fall on you'll still be making a comfortable living.
My apologies, I misinterpreted it as reasonable expectations for the median and mean income for your career there. Any thoughts on how these top shops compare to each other and to the stated figures?
Error nihil ipsa voluptatum id esse suscipit fuga. Adipisci aliquam nobis a voluptatem quia molestiae. Voluptatibus architecto voluptatem nisi veritatis voluptatem aspernatur. At sequi itaque expedita optio quibusdam quasi magnam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...