Cross Currency Hedging

First off not sure if this belongs here, but I wasn't sure where else to put it.

I am having some difficulties at work. I work on a small team of traders and we are otc market makers in spot fx. I will explain my issues through an example.

We are trading with customers/clients all day and have net exposure. At some point during the day we decide we don't want this exposure or want to lessen the risk by reducing the positions. I understand that concept of cross currency hedging and that if we are long AUD and Short JPY it makes sense to work with that pair instead of trading AUD/USD and USD/JPY. What I am looking for is some concrete ways to identify a cost efficient hedge and when to unwind that hedge. Any help is appreciated.

9 Comments
 

Not sure how you can be a ccy mkt maker and not know how to mitigate your currency risk...

Anyway, you would calculate your net exposure to each CCY ie calculate USD, AUD, JPY, EUR etc you have on your books. You can then try to boil it down to your core positions.

This, however, has nothing to do with your hedging strategies. For example, yeah sure you could end up realising you have a GBPSEK position. Awesome, how do you hedge it, trading GBPSEK? Probably not, likely the most efficient way to hedge it with direct market interaction is to trade EURGBP and EURSEK.

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 

The most cost effective way is to deal in the most liquid pairs that make up the cross. Forgive me for being snide but it is hard to believe you have worked on a spot desk for longer than 2 days without learning this.

 
Best Response

The reason I don't know this is because where I work they do it by customers. So if a customer trades shitty they don't hedge them or only hedge a portion. If a customer is a "good" trader they hedge them. Believe me I have been beating my head against the wall trying to figure out why, but that's the way they do it.

so far we do look at our net exposure to each instrument and then say whoa that's big position and only will offset it because its a big position and we don't want that risk. WE DON'T LOOK AT ANYTHING ELSE. Which is fucking asinine. So if I have all these net positions and I want to eliminate the risk on a cross pair, I buy or sell the pair. I get that, but what is holding the desk back from doing this instead of shifting customer accounts is that they don't know how to unwind the hedges or when to? I haven't been at the job long and took it thinking that I would learning all the stuff I SHOULD be learning. Turns out I only get a portion of that experience. Any reading or resources are greatly appreciated, because I am short of resources obviously.

 

25% IRR is typically the low end of the range for an LBO. You won't see many buyers pursue something that wont return an IRR of 25% (and yes, that is per annum).

I'm not sure I understand the complexity of this case, but it seems pretty straightforward. A PE firm is investing 10% of the total enterprise value. with an IRR of 25% you can calculate how much equity the PE firm can expect to receive in 5 years. and assuming the forward rate is a 5yr rate (same for puts) then this is pretty straightforward. you are missing quite a bit of detail though so I can't give a direct answer without knowing more.

 

do your own home work. its d only way to learn. calculate the equity return per yr. calculate the forward rate to (1+f5). multiply and thats it.

All things are possible with Him i have to deal
 

Consequuntur velit fuga porro. Ullam id voluptatem aliquid laudantium.

Consequatur ea id perferendis in inventore. Et repudiandae officiis accusantium quis cumque reiciendis. Aut repellat in ab culpa sit modi. Sint ratione provident minima delectus. Et excepturi dicta quisquam unde.

Nisi aut doloribus quas totam rerum optio tenetur consectetur. Repellendus corrupti autem architecto impedit non. Quibusdam quis beatae quia voluptas voluptas architecto. Aut iste architecto ea et consequatur. Fuga dolores aperiam et aliquid.

Quia aut id doloribus natus molestias. Voluptas corrupti velit doloremque doloribus architecto nihil id. Repellat quis dolores quaerat nemo numquam.

- "Yesterday's History and Tomorrow's a Mystery"

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”