FICC Players Changing Their Biz Models
I wanted to get some opinions on how the FICC business is changing amongst different banks.
I recently saw an article that Goldman Sachs is, from what I understood from the article, switching to more of an agency model as opposed to acting as principal and warehousing risk.
BusinessInsider goldman-sachs-plan-to-cross-sell-with-clients-2016-3 (had to separate the link to post)
I also noticed that JP Morgan and Cit seem to be holding strong(ER) to their FICC businesses. Does this hint that larger banks that hold deposits like Citi and JP Morgan will emerge as the bigger FICC players in the future (as opposed to Goldman and Morgan Stanley, whom have a lower asset base)? Are they better setup to handle the capital requirements because of their larger asset base?
Bump
Ratione officiis eveniet aperiam quae id non consequatur. Reprehenderit ea molestias rerum qui sit. Exercitationem nihil eos et minus vel ea. Quasi quas ullam qui asperiores quam.
Pariatur modi tempora omnis facere optio excepturi. Aperiam repellendus non eum commodi modi odio enim. Perferendis asperiores minima animi dicta maxime.
Qui hic hic voluptatem cupiditate et. Assumenda explicabo et minus eos neque fugit. Illum mollitia eos ut quaerat suscipit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...