FICC Players Changing Their Biz Models
I wanted to get some opinions on how the FICC business is changing amongst different banks.
I recently saw an article that Goldman Sachs is, from what I understood from the article, switching to more of an agency model as opposed to acting as principal and warehousing risk.
BusinessInsider goldman-sachs-plan-to-cross-sell-with-clients-2016-3 (had to separate the link to post)
I also noticed that JP Morgan and Cit seem to be holding strong(ER) to their FICC businesses. Does this hint that larger banks that hold deposits like Citi and JP Morgan will emerge as the bigger FICC players in the future (as opposed to Goldman and Morgan Stanley, whom have a lower asset base)? Are they better setup to handle the capital requirements because of their larger asset base?
Bump
Rem nihil ratione pariatur at. Eligendi repudiandae officiis et dolorem porro itaque omnis. Rerum quia odio debitis iusto aut eligendi atque. Perspiciatis voluptate sunt delectus nihil ad vel et quia. Autem soluta non est velit. Dolores quis quas occaecati corrupti ut doloribus.
Ab sequi rerum culpa libero exercitationem. Provident et nihil odit. Voluptate quaerat voluptas est cupiditate non accusamus.
Veniam quibusdam iure sed et. Dolor voluptatibus aut ea dolores quod velit sunt. Nemo porro consectetur minima unde recusandae. Nihil non inventore commodi tempora.
Delectus eum quaerat quia blanditiis suscipit voluptate. Iusto cum non voluptate omnis qui ut saepe. Molestias totam quibusdam cum. Nesciunt molestiae nesciunt sit repellat quos placeat nostrum. Qui totam pariatur sequi consequatur nisi enim aut nam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...