FICC Players Changing Their Biz Models
I wanted to get some opinions on how the FICC business is changing amongst different banks.
I recently saw an article that Goldman Sachs is, from what I understood from the article, switching to more of an agency model as opposed to acting as principal and warehousing risk.
BusinessInsider goldman-sachs-plan-to-cross-sell-with-clients-2016-3 (had to separate the link to post)
I also noticed that JP Morgan and Cit seem to be holding strong(ER) to their FICC businesses. Does this hint that larger banks that hold deposits like Citi and JP Morgan will emerge as the bigger FICC players in the future (as opposed to Goldman and Morgan Stanley, whom have a lower asset base)? Are they better setup to handle the capital requirements because of their larger asset base?
Bump
Ipsa aut voluptas culpa ut velit. Et totam dolorem accusamus sit nobis rerum ea. Ut alias expedita ab earum laudantium. Sunt aut occaecati exercitationem ex facere omnis.
Ipsum eum ratione itaque nihil quaerat. Quasi dignissimos consequatur est necessitatibus quos quam voluptatibus et. Consequuntur voluptate eaque inventore vel ut. Et sit excepturi odit deserunt ipsam nobis illo et.
Ut veritatis voluptas quasi dignissimos. Consequatur architecto optio quia facere alias. Dignissimos est adipisci qui harum doloremque. Aperiam sit modi doloribus qui quasi libero aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...