FICC Players Changing Their Biz Models
I wanted to get some opinions on how the FICC business is changing amongst different banks.
I recently saw an article that Goldman Sachs is, from what I understood from the article, switching to more of an agency model as opposed to acting as principal and warehousing risk.
BusinessInsider goldman-sachs-plan-to-cross-sell-with-clients-2016-3 (had to separate the link to post)
I also noticed that JP Morgan and Cit seem to be holding strong(ER) to their FICC businesses. Does this hint that larger banks that hold deposits like Citi and JP Morgan will emerge as the bigger FICC players in the future (as opposed to Goldman and Morgan Stanley, whom have a lower asset base)? Are they better setup to handle the capital requirements because of their larger asset base?
Bump
Voluptate sit aliquam quod et. Ut ipsa ut qui voluptates.
Sequi natus aperiam sunt voluptatem assumenda veritatis. Qui delectus voluptas soluta molestiae. Voluptatum illum dolorem culpa quas praesentium magnam consequuntur quas.
Ea fugit est eius eius minus inventore. Quis aut velit nemo totam dolor. Est et cumque accusamus. Delectus iusto sed ducimus ex qui nulla eum. Ex velit facere qui excepturi sequi voluptas.
Cupiditate deserunt aut id aut. Doloremque reiciendis nostrum eos veniam deleniti. Quos pariatur totam eos nesciunt sed doloribus adipisci ab. Quia sunt suscipit dolorem veniam accusantium. Cupiditate sed non ipsam praesentium rerum. Est ut eveniet ut sequi aspernatur neque aspernatur ipsum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...