How is the Non-Agency CMBS / RMBS Space?
I'm starting fulltime in S&T at a BB (Morgan Stanley, Citi, BoA) this summer and have had good conversations with the Non-Agency MBS desks, RMBS in particular (big macro guy and to my understanding RMBS is a little more rates oriented). Just interested to hear this community's thoughts on the space from a career trajectory, compensation, sustainability (at risk of being downsized), etc. perspective. To my knowledge, the BB is a strong player in the space.
For bonus points, interested in hearing about major metrics to be paying attention to, primary things to know ahead of the more technical interviews, etc.
I work in the space (buy-side) and in general find it pretty interesting. There is a lot of different routes you can go in terms of products, type of firm (BB, HF, Large Asset Manager), role in the field (trading, sales, banking, structuring, syndicate). From a product perspective, there is CRT/Jumbo which are more rate sensitive and closer to Agency MBS, or RPL/NPL, NonQM, Expanded Prime, etc which are more credit sensitive and closer compared to corporate bond land.
Feel free to ask any questions you might have on the space.
Are you more on the nonagency credit side or agency MBS side? or a generalist?
Pretty much 100% Non-Agency, but the line blurs a little bit sometimes as production that could go to an Agency ends up in the private market
Would you say compared to some other roles (equities is the low-hanging fruit, but even some sects of FI like vanilla rates) in S&T there’s a decent and sustainable niche to be carved out? I find MBS to be super interesting but want to ensure I’m setting myself up for a long and potentially fruitful career.
In all honestly nobody really knows what is sustainable. In 2005 guys who were trading CDOs thought it they were "safe" but we all know how that turned out. If anybody really understood the pace and application in of technology to the S&T world then they would be sitting at a VC betting on the companies that are making or it creating it themselves. If you like a product and think its interesting go for it b/c who the hell knows what is coming next. Part of the fun of S&T is the fact that you never know where your career will take you and if you look at the guys who stick many have worn a lot of different hats over their careers. Personally I think MBS is only going to get more interesting if we continue to see the agencies back away from the market, but I think the days of pay-option ARMs and people with sub 600 FICOs getting mortgages are never coming back.
I'm a bit late to this thread, but seems to me that MBS isn't going away any time soon. MBS issuance is second only to treasury issuance and entirely traded over-the-counter (not over an electronic exchange) which implies that paths to automation are limited...
Thanks for this. I had some questions about the NA RMBS space. I'm interviewing with a BB for the NA RMBS structuring group.
Thanks a lot for this!
As someone who isn't sure if they want to stay in S&T forever (or beyond 3 years), how transferable is the knowledge from trading MBS (and other securitized products) to a CLO issuer or big Real Estate shop/HF arm (Bx, Brookfield, KKR)
Its decently transferable, those type of places tend to like securitized product bankers/research better for their more junior roles but there are plenty of sell-side traders who work at those type of places but generally after spending some time at another asset manager (PIMCO, Blackrock, etc.). All that being said it really comes down to networking, you will be trading with all those places a good bit so you will know them well.
Voluptatibus a explicabo dolor sapiente. Est et quod nostrum eum eveniet eveniet in. Qui minima sunt iste. Aliquid at beatae corrupti tempora atque a et voluptatibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...