The Volcker Rule will suffer death by committee

From Sen Dodd's senate financial reform bill:

1 SEC. 989. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE STUDY 2 ON PROPRIETARY TRADING. 3 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 4 (1) the term ‘‘covered entity’’ means— 5 (A) an insured depository institution, an 6 affiliate of an insured depository institution, a 7 bank holding company, a financial holding com8 pany, or a subsidiary of a bank holding com9 pany or a financial holding company, as those 10 terms are defined in the Bank Holding Com11 pany Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.); and 12 (B) any other entity, as the Comptroller 13 General of the United States may determine; 14 and 15 (2) the term ‘‘proprietary trading’’ means the 16 act of a covered entity investing as a principal in se 17curities, commodities, derivatives, hedge funds, pri 18vate equity firms, or such other financial products or 19 entities as the Comptroller General may determine. 20 (b) STUDY.— 21 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of 22 the United States shall conduct a study regarding 23 the risks and conflicts associated with proprietary 24 trading by and within covered entities, including an 25 evaluation of— 1 (A) whether proprietary trading presents a 2 material systemic risk to the stability of the 3 United States financial system, and if so, the 4 costs and benefits of options for mitigating such 5 systemic risk; 6 (B) whether proprietary trading presents 7 material risks to the safety and soundness of 8 the covered entities that engage in such activi9 ties, and if so, the costs and benefits of options 10 for mitigating such risks; 11 (C) whether proprietary trading present 12 material conflicts of interest between covered 13 entities that engage in proprietary trading and 14 the clients of the institutions who use the firm 15 to execute trades or who rely on the firm to 16 manage assets, and if so, the costs and benefits 17 of options for mitigating such conflicts of inter18 est; 19 (D) whether adequate disclosure regarding 20 the risks and conflicts of proprietary trading is 21 provided to the depositors, trading and asset 22 management clients, and investors of covered 23 entities that engage in proprietary trading, and 24 if not, the costs and benefits of options for the 25 improvement of such disclosure; and 1 (E) whether the banking, securities, and 2 commodities regulators of institutions that en3 gage in proprietary trading have in place ade4 quate systems and controls to monitor and con5 tain any risks and conflicts of interest related 6 to proprietary trading, and if not, the costs and 7 benefits of options for the improvement of such 8 systems and controls. 9 (2) CONSIDERATIONS.—In carrying out the 10 study required under paragraph (1), the Comptroller 11 General shall consider— 12 (A) current practice relating to proprietary 13 trading; 14 (B) the advisability of a complete ban on 15 proprietary trading; 16 (C) limitations on the scope of activities 17 that covered entities may engage in with respect 18 to proprietary trading; 19 (D) the advisability of additional capital 20 requirements for covered entities that engage in 21 proprietary trading; 22 (E) enhanced restrictions on transactions 23 between affiliates related to proprietary trading; 24 (F) enhanced accounting disclosures relat25 ing to proprietary trading; 1 (G) enhanced public disclosure relating to 2 proprietary trading; and 3 (H) any other options the Comptroller 4 General deems appropriate. 5 (c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 15 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comp7 troller General shall submit a report to Congress on the 8 results of the study conducted under subsection (b).

No BBs will be "decimated" or "broken up". Prop trading desks are here to stay. In 15 months, the Volcker Rule won't be at the top of anyone's agenda, especially since the GOP will have much stronger representation. All this hyperventilation about the end of trading is downright stupid.

4 Comments
 
Best Response

You were right. After Repub. Sen. Shelby + Brownback covertly blocked the volcker-esque amendments to the financial reform bill nobody is trying anymore. Meanwhile we continue to hear press about how "sweeping financial requlation" has passed in the past month and how wall street bank's have repaid bailout funds with interest- now enabling them to produce the amazing profit numbers we have seen through their sheer genius expertise.

Oh my fucking god. It is still great to be elite in America. Though increased 250 basis points in Feb, the discount window rate is still only ~500 bps above the fed funds rate (and actually there are different rates charged to different institutions, it still approaches 0% in some instances). And still no audit of the Fed to see how much this is being taken advantage of. And the press still has quotes about how "auditing the fed would weaken banks reptuation blah blah".

I know this is a simplication- but the idea holds true: Imagine how much easy money can be made at ANONYMOUS borrowing at 0.5-0.75% where where you can use a pile of your own feces as collateral. People were amazed at how agg. trading activity at GS, MS, JPM, etc made a profit every day of Q1. The only amazing (ok actually impossible) thing would be if they didn't.

 

This is why Obama is actually a gift to the right... the guy is the master of "Doing nothing but saying we did". Look at healthcare. Look at financial reform. (btw I don't intend to be biased here at all). If you take a look at the 1.5 years he has been in office, the man has not really done anything substantial, but has claimed that he has.

Will healthcare meet its stated goals? No Will financial reform? No

He has mastered the art of "Do nothing but say we did".

looking for that pick-me-up to power through an all-nighter?
 

Ad ut tenetur qui sed. Dolorem illum quis omnis cumque dignissimos sapiente et. Sint dolorem dolores ut voluptas sed. Qui veniam officiis placeat accusantium est. Consequatur delectus ullam ratione neque consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”