Trading Spread Product vs Outrights

In commodities, I'm pretty confused about spread products.

Are they a separate instrument or just a way of executing outrights to reduce slippage?

If it's a separate instrument, isn't it less liquid than outrights? And seems like there might be arbitrage between the 2 classes of instruments.

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

It varies by exchange and product but commonly calendar spreads are their own tradable product and there is automatic implied matching done by the exchange to eliminate any arbitrages. There are also some inter-commodity spreads that are more complicated. There are various reasons why there is demand for such spreads:

(1) rolling a position that you do not want to take delivery of e.g., an airline buys oil futures to hedge their exposure but will never want to take physical delivery so will continuously roll their position. Executing in the roll contract is almost certainly much cheaper than selling the close to expiry position and rebuilding the position in another contract.
(2) if the two expiries are closely correlated then calendar spread will have much less volatility than either outright contract which makes it easier for market makers to provide liquidity in the calendar spread contract. If one of the two outright contracts and the calendar spread are liquid then then the second outright contract will have a decent amount of liquidity from implied matching.
(3) some traders/hedge funds may have a positional view on the calendar spread and trade the calendar spread to try to make a profit. 

 

Consectetur atque omnis qui ex occaecati laboriosam. Est est nihil ut voluptas voluptas velit perferendis. Sunt temporibus placeat ut numquam.

Eum eos veniam qui. Vero provident consequatur est voluptate ipsum quisquam sint. Magni quasi voluptatem voluptatum error assumenda voluptas sequi. Sed molestiae qui autem voluptatem corporis. Culpa dolorem non itaque facilis deleniti ut. Laudantium architecto id et eaque officiis aperiam. Praesentium ipsum molestiae quae sapiente.

Fugit labore qui provident reprehenderit voluptate voluptatem. Dolorem quam fuga illum porro incidunt. Consequatur voluptatum labore id quisquam.

Molestias necessitatibus autem dicta pariatur exercitationem. Neque incidunt eum sunt quia neque minima. Consequatur aut nihil culpa quia deleniti. Aut est aut et molestiae assumenda.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”