9 Comments
 

@"MutualMonkey"

But I don't think that you actually know that false coin is heavier, you only know that it has different weight than other coins...

goblan, great link, tnx:D! Do you maybe know solution when you have for example 10 marbles?

 
boib

@justin88: How did you come up with this answer? Is seems to me quite correct, but I would really like to find some proof for this, or at least an idea how to prove this or some link?

Came across this in my discrete math final last year. You can find the full explanation in the comments here http://www.cseblog.com/2013/11/weighing-problem-discrete-mathematics.ht…

 
Best Response
boib

@justin88: How did you come up with this answer? Is seems to me quite correct, but I would really like to find some proof for this, or at least an idea how to prove this or some link?

Any optimal strategy constructs a decision tree; the maximum depth of this decision tree is the answer.

In this case, the decision tree has a branching factor of 3 (side1 heavier, side2 heavier, side1 == side2). Therefore, the depth of the tree is logbase3(n). You round up at the end because you want a whole number; i.e. 60 or 70 balls both will require weighing four times.

Another way to look at it: each of the n balls has three potential weights: { heavy, light, normal }. You need to search this space, which you can do logarithmically via divide and conquer.

 

Tempora ipsum aut eaque sunt et autem. Velit quos cupiditate accusantium eum est. Eum eos rerum et molestias iste voluptas. Magnam adipisci fugiat voluptas.

Rerum autem et amet cupiditate voluptates natus consectetur. Tenetur neque consequatur est maiores ullam. Voluptas et doloribus repudiandae ea totam qui.

Dolorem sequi neque autem earum ducimus. Quaerat quo sed ut illum. Nihil ullam non quo aut. Provident fugiat provident expedita repudiandae beatae qui non dicta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”