Which companies in Chicago are siloed, and which are collaborative?

This post is to get some idea about how to find a good employer next. I'm a junior quant at a HFT prop trading company. I've been here for just over two years. My job is to dig out any alphas and then feed them to the downstream department for strategy fabrication. It is very restricted and I don't see much learning opportunity or growth space. I constantly find myself lost and frustrated, since I don't get the chance to learn about and to explore the industry as a junior in the early stage of my career. Eg. I'm not allowed to know anything about how to monetize, and it's very unlikely to switch to a different group. (Don't ask why I've stayed for two years please.) I put "silo" in the title, since I don't know the exact word for the style of my employer. "Compartmentalized"? (I used to not like "silo" but now I think it's much better than what I have on plate. ) For next job, I hope to land somewhere more collaborative so that I could do something more comprehensive. Yet, I find it very hard to know the structuring style of the company before actually signing up, since they tend to keep it very secretive (just like my current employer). So, I wonder if you guys could share any information on this. Also, I'm relocating to Chicago, any recommended firms in the city? Thanks a lot!

5 Comments
 

As you mentioned there are definitely some firms which are siloed and some which have more of a collaboritive culture. This is something you should try to get a sense of when you are interviewing with the company and talking with people in the industry. In my experience the firms which sell themselves as technology companies are more collaborative then others. Can't think of any in Chicago of the top of my head but G-Research, GSA Capital, Two Sigma all seem to be very collaborative

 

The MM platform funds are siloed but you usually have access to everything within your team, and get exposure to the full PM process. A lot of funds who say they are "collaborative" are actually siloed in the bad kind of way described by the OP above. They often won't tell you this before you join, and if you end up in those places it's hard to go anywhere else since you don't learn anything useful. I think most of the big funds that hire fresh graduates every year are like this today.

 

Est et cum esse laudantium maxime voluptas natus. Esse rerum autem similique enim fugit qui quo. Quis ut veniam ea optio placeat quod fugiat. Qui sit fuga labore omnis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”