Why don't they make an exotic product prop shop?

I know this question is really dumb, but I'm curious. Why don't they have proprietary trading firms to trade exotic products? By structured products, I mean structured credit products (CDOs, CLOs,CMOs, and other ABS), energy derivatives (swaps, forwards, linked notes, etc), and interest rate derivatives (I know this isn't structured) like(swaptions,Turbos, Snowballs, etc). I know that liquidity is a major issue in trading exotic derivs like the ones mentioned. Intellect is an issue as trading exotics requires more 'skill' than equities. What else do you think prevents a exotic product prop shop?

10 Comments
 

Just about all of these products are traded OTC, so there is less transparency, less liquidity as you mentioned, and I could be wrong about this part, but I think a lot of these products are still traded over the phone. Since most of these firms have a competitive advantage in technology, they would lose this edge if they moved into the exotic space. That being said, a part of the OTC market is starting to be captured by exchanges, especially CME, so it is possible that once CME makes more ground, you could see some firms start to move into the exotic space, this last part is just an educated guess though.

 

very insightful view by above poster. i work closely the dcm and agree with just about all points regarding derivs except that i don't see many players entering the exotic space in the near future given the market climate associated with the structured vehicles that started this mess in the markets. it's stupid really, but the fact of the matter is risk management won't see expansion into anything related in the short term.

 
Best Response

You also need to keep in mind who is the market for structured products. Some exotic products, like a commodities basket option or a principal-protected note on a basket option, for example, are usually geared towards investors, who are buying and holding (real money investors, for example).

Other products are bespoke hedging solutions geared toward someone with an underlying exposure (so in commodities it would be a corporation like P&G or Southwest), but again, someone who is also looking to buy and hold. For corporates the hedging solutions are so structured that they would be of no use to anyone but the intended client. As a result, there's really not much in the way of secondary trading of most structured products. Hence, few people actually "trade" them.

That's why at banks the sales people and structurers are the ones who are most active in structured products, whereas the traders are usually just hedging out the risk involved in structuring and selling structured products to clients.

 
Very interesting views.. The whole thing about losing the tech edge is pretty interesting. So when do you think that exchanges will start incoporating OverTheCounter derivs into their operations?

http://www.afr0jacks.com/ Afro Jacks

 

Quia possimus aut velit aliquid. Ipsa dignissimos minima minus est. Doloremque corrupti omnis aliquam molestias voluptas dolores voluptatem cupiditate. Qui sit tempore laboriosam architecto nesciunt maxime tempore. Libero deserunt voluptas enim excepturi qui. Quia perspiciatis optio delectus.

In dolorem aspernatur velit nesciunt. Quia in placeat aut sit repudiandae laudantium.

Impedit distinctio labore dolorem. Qui quo tenetur sapiente incidunt. Animi assumenda suscipit ut eius eius nemo ipsa. Consequatur voluptas reprehenderit voluptatem sit pariatur ut eveniet quo.

Quam aperiam soluta corporis ut recusandae est et. Nam ex placeat dolorum voluptatem. Laudantium et nam qui aspernatur. Sit totam quod laudantium reiciendis. Et aspernatur nobis eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”