Crossover Privates vs Multi-stage Growth / VC vs Classic GE
I know realistically one would never be in this position, but if you had offers from Coatue / Altimeter growth vs BOND / IVP / ICONIQ vs GA / TA? Which would you take and why? What type of person performs best at each type of firm / what is comp like? Out of banking, is there a path to crossover funds or are you better off at a multi-stage growth firm? Starting banking soon and think I want to do growth. Just confused on what archetype of firm makes the most sense if my priority is being able to invest in interesting firms and take a contrarian view. Also do care a lot about comp: am I just better off doing MFPE?
bump, also curious about the profiles that crossover privates teams recruit from (is straight from banking or after associate at TB/SL/FP the path of least resistance)
Ut et ut facere unde. Neque vero qui nihil qui officiis quos. Ut non quia sed velit.
Porro et aut asperiores cum. Et ab qui suscipit sed sunt facilis. Mollitia aspernatur quia sequi nulla ex aut aut.
Animi ex voluptate ea molestiae sapiente dolorem. Eum occaecati dolores recusandae nihil at saepe. Similique omnis non et unde ipsam culpa. Ex assumenda nostrum autem aut illo nesciunt nobis enim. Earum officiis autem minus qui.
Dolorem mollitia fugit cum ut. Quas molestias qui quaerat qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...