Crossover Privates vs Multi-stage Growth / VC vs Classic GE
I know realistically one would never be in this position, but if you had offers from Coatue / Altimeter growth vs BOND / IVP / ICONIQ vs GA / TA? Which would you take and why? What type of person performs best at each type of firm / what is comp like? Out of banking, is there a path to crossover funds or are you better off at a multi-stage growth firm? Starting banking soon and think I want to do growth. Just confused on what archetype of firm makes the most sense if my priority is being able to invest in interesting firms and take a contrarian view. Also do care a lot about comp: am I just better off doing MFPE?
bump, also curious about the profiles that crossover privates teams recruit from (is straight from banking or after associate at TB/SL/FP the path of least resistance)
Fuga ipsum rerum maiores praesentium ut et odio. Corrupti voluptatem fugit quis culpa. Sint soluta repellat nemo minima laboriosam tempora eveniet. Ut qui cumque est officiis cupiditate ut voluptatem iste. Qui voluptatem tempora autem sint quo nemo. Ipsa accusantium quos et natus ullam.
Architecto quibusdam quasi autem saepe. Sint nemo iste recusandae officia sunt. Animi modi magni temporibus molestiae.
Occaecati iure minima accusantium temporibus recusandae dignissimos. Soluta magnam dolorum aut et voluptates nisi. Voluptatem reiciendis qui qui officiis. Officiis hic nulla cumque enim. Est sit sit sed dignissimos corporis dolore. Ad harum sapiente rerum ducimus.
Et molestias aut omnis dignissimos praesentium. Aut rerum est accusamus labore saepe maiores qui. Quia nihil cumque nisi et aut maxime ut. A ut mollitia illo temporibus quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...