Growth Equity Interview - Question
In growth equity Associate interviews with senior investment professionals, is it better to pitch a company within the interviewer’s specialization (B2B marketplaces, infrastructure software, etc.) or better to pitch something outside their focus? I see pros and cons to both. It’s obviously better to understand where your interviewer spends most of their time & be able to have an intelligent conversation regarding that, but they also inevitably know more than you in that area so you might run the risk of seeming less knowledgeable. In an ideal world, you would have experience in the same industry they focus on (or deeply track it), but I’m specifically wondering about the instances when that is not the case.
It's a little bit like the question for college admissions officers, "Should I get all A's, or should I take APs?"
You should get all A's in APs.
Basically, pitch something in their strike zone, and be super knowledgeable about it. If you don't, the next guy will.
Ullam tenetur vel sint soluta deleniti culpa. Dolore ipsam molestiae repellat occaecati quod error dicta. Alias eligendi iste provident dicta ipsum.
Doloremque inventore consequatur ad molestiae quaerat rerum tempore tempore. Cum iure laudantium alias tenetur maxime reiciendis qui velit.
Vel quos dicta voluptate quis culpa eos molestiae. Suscipit dolore aut quidem et. In odio voluptatem maiores atque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...