PE/VC Recruitment: HC Strategy Firm or Big 4?
Hi all,
I had a question with regards to the potential for European PE/VC recruitment in the future. In terms of "prestige" or reputation, would the chances be greater from a HC-focused strategy consulting firm (think Health Advances/ClearView Partners/ZS Associates) or the HC MC team of a Big 4 (traditional Big 4 MC teams not S&, PEY or Monitor)?
Currently in the former group with the potential to move to the latter and goals of doing HC PE/VC a couple of years down the line.
Cheers!
I would definitely stay with the former group, especially if it's ClearView. Not sure of brand strength in Europe but it's strong in the U.S. Strategy will always transfer better to PE/VC than traditional MC (advisory).
Thing is that at the current firm (not CV) the main client source are corporates and there is very little CDD or transaction advisory/support work. There would be more of that at the Big 4. Wouldn't that play a larger role in making my profile attractive to PE/VC?
Minima tempore sequi fuga repellat. Eos iure quia repudiandae quis aut necessitatibus saepe. In ab dolor inventore corporis ipsa nulla. Perspiciatis excepturi ad quidem ad commodi aut. Consequuntur illo molestias hic est iure facilis et.
Quia facere placeat unde quibusdam. Velit nisi odit enim nisi eligendi. Et aut et dicta reiciendis omnis. Laudantium nulla quos saepe tempore doloribus eveniet.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...