VC and the "Moneyball" strategy

A Moneyball-style revolution is taking place in venture capital. Just as the renegade general manager of the Oakland A’s flouted assumptions about baseball and replaced gut feelings and outdated statistics with more effective quantitative analysis, a new breed of venture capital firms are throwing out their Magic 8-balls and are using computer-based models to make smarter investments.

Is this becoming a new trend in VC?

http://venturebeat.com/2012/11/09/startup-algorit…

9 Comments
 

Check out Correlation Ventures, they raised the largest first vc fund since Andreessen Horowitz. They promise an investment response within two weeks of the first meeting largely because they use predictive analytics. Jury is still out on this model as it takes a good amount of a fund cycle to prove it out obviously.

http://correlationvc.com/

"If you want to succeed in this life, you need to understand that duty comes before rights and that responsibility precedes opportunity."
 

[quote=TheBigBambino]Check out Correlation Ventures, they raised the largest first vc fund since Andreessen Horowitz. They promise an investment response within two weeks of the first meeting largely because they use predictive analytics. Jury is still out on this model as it takes a good amount of a fund cycle to prove it out obviously.

http://correlationvc.com/[/quote] This looks like they only do coinvest. Is that true?
If so, it would be easier to believe that this would work, since someone else has done a lot of the heavy lifting and they would basically be able to figure out who to piggyback off in which scenario with their models.

Direct VC doesn't lend itself to quant modeling in my mind. At all.

 
SirTradesaLot][quote=TheBigBambino]Check out Correlation Ventures, they raised the largest first vc fund since Andreessen Horowitz. They promise an investment response within two weeks of the first meeting largely because they use predictive analytics. Jury is still out on this model as it takes a good amount of a fund cycle to prove it out obviously.

http://correlationvc.com/[/quote

This looks like they only do coinvest. Is that true?
If so, it would be easier to believe that this would work, since someone else has done a lot of the heavy lifting and they would basically be able to figure out who to piggyback off in which scenario with their models.

Direct VC doesn't lend itself to quant modeling in my mind. At all.

It appears you may be right. It looks like they do some pretty heavy hitting syndicates but never take lead. Still means they have to do a lot of due diligence and make a final call but I get your point. This makes a lot more sense to me, I was having trouble figuring out how they did their sourcing while relying on these models but it's a bit more clear now.

I think the model is interested. Obviously I think people will matter more than a predictive model but I'm really interested to see their fund performance in 5-7 years from now. If the strategy works well to mitigate financial risk and still produce 2x+ returns for their fund sounds like they figured something really cool out to me.

"If you want to succeed in this life, you need to understand that duty comes before rights and that responsibility precedes opportunity."
 
TheBigBambino][quote=SirTradesaLot
TheBigBambino]Check out Correlation Ventures, they raised the largest first vc fund since Andreessen Horowitz. They promise an investment response within two weeks of the first meeting largely because they use predictive analytics. Jury is still out on this model as it takes a good amount of a fund cycle to prove it out obviously.

http://correlationvc.com/[/quote

This looks like they only do coinvest. Is that true?
If so, it would be easier to believe that this would work, since someone else has done a lot of the heavy lifting and they would basically be able to figure out who to piggyback off in which scenario with their models.

Direct VC doesn't lend itself to quant modeling in my mind. At all.

It appears you may be right. It looks like they do some pretty heavy hitting syndicates but never take lead. Still means they have to do a lot of due diligence and make a final call but I get your point. This makes a lot more sense to me, I was having trouble figuring out how they did their sourcing while relying on these models but it's a bit more clear now.

I think the model is interested. Obviously I think people will matter more than a predictive model but I'm really interested to see their fund performance in 5-7 years from now. If the strategy works well to mitigate financial risk and still produce 2x+ returns for their fund sounds like they figured something really cool out to me.

I'm curious to see how it plays out as well. Hopefully, I remember to check it out in 2020.
 
Best Response

It may work as a screening tool, but I'm not a believer that this will drastically alter how VC investments are made. Baseball and elections are very different than the startup world. Past correlations and statistics don't mean much in an ever changing marketplace and environment where imperfect data sets exist. Monitoring job postings may be great, but wouldn't it be better to look at actual hiring patters, which can't be captured due to the private nature of startups?

Human bias is necessary in business because deals and selling still get done by humans. I believe that trying to remove the human element is a mistake (although it doesn't appear that's really what the VCs mentioned here are doing). The true value of a startup is in its human capital.

For growth capital stage companies this might make more sense as you can measure capital intensiveness relative to growth and other metrics that might lead to different decision making.

 
TechBankingI believe that trying to remove the human element is a mistake (although it doesn't appear that's really what the VCs mentioned here are doing). The true value of a startup is in its human capital.
This. It's not the idea, it's the team. You're not investing in Google, you're investing in Larry and Sergey.
 
dagwood
TechBankingI believe that trying to remove the human element is a mistake (although it doesn't appear that's really what the VCs mentioned here are doing). The true value of a startup is in its human capital.
This. It's not the idea, it's the team. You're not investing in Google, you're investing in Larry and Sergey.

Bingo.

 

Does anyone know if there are publically-available examples of these quantitative models? Are they based on PE models?

 

Quis dolorem deleniti consectetur eos unde. Repellat et est molestiae libero quas.

Id rerum aliquam aspernatur quia magni modi consequatur fugit. Eligendi sapiente mollitia impedit enim velit est. Iusto voluptas aut consequatur culpa praesentium quis. Qui autem repellendus quaerat sunt. Corrupti quia totam consequatur ut aut. Quibusdam corporis facere debitis voluptatum ipsum.

Vel sequi ullam debitis assumenda unde dolores reprehenderit. Porro iure odio sint consequuntur magni aperiam autem. Placeat aut laudantium aperiam consequatur totam dolorem. Qui beatae ut qui accusantium exercitationem impedit quis ut. Ut molestiae cumque occaecati quae consequatur.

Doloribus nobis at id suscipit sed eos. Sint qui at veritatis ipsum qui eligendi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”