accounting help! will give SB to fellow monkeys!!!!

HI monkeys,

i am in need of your help~~
i attached the picture of my question..
please follow the red lines for question 1, and blue lines for question 2...
image here: http://i47.tinypic.com/nd671f.jpg
thanks!!!!!!!!!
will give out many silver bananas

 

Look at the A/A of "Streaming" between 2010 and 2011. It increased by less than 500K, while the CF shows 700K for 2011 amortization.

With regards to DVDs, take a look at Acquisition of content (85K), Total content lib in 2010 (627K), and Total content lib in 2011 (599K). Now look at the Amortization in 2011 - 97K. Difference between amortization and investment is about 12K, doesn't explain it all, but might give you a start in terms of hunting for clues.

Good luck

 
Best Response

Red: Right now the assumption you're making is that the depreciation expense incurred in a year = the change in accumulated depreciation between two years on the balance sheet. Think about what must be true for that to happen. Hint: it's about fixed asset movement: within a year a company can (1) purchase fixed assets, (2) dispose / sell fixed assets, or (3) both. Notice the logic fallacy yet?

Blue: Look at your current comparison between the two years on the balance sheet. What's weird about your comparison figures? Hint: for (1), you're using the cost of the DVDs, but for (2), you're using the cost of the DVDs less amortization, given there's no current content library for both years. When you understand this, think again about the potential movement of DVDs within a year. To do a mini-test for your understanding, try figuring out how much the company has disposed in DVDs between the two years. You have enough info in your picture to figure this out.

Hopefully this helps more than giving you the answers

 
quattroblanc:
Red: Right now the assumption you're making is that the depreciation expense incurred in a year = the change in accumulated depreciation between two years on the balance sheet. Think about what must be true for that to happen. Hint: it's about fixed asset movement: within a year a company can (1) purchase fixed assets, (2) dispose / sell fixed assets, or (3) both. Notice the logic fallacy yet?

Blue: Look at your current comparison between the two years on the balance sheet. What's weird about your comparison figures? Hint: for (1), you're using the cost of the DVDs, but for (2), you're using the cost of the DVDs less amortization, given there's no current content library for both years. When you understand this, think again about the potential movement of DVDs within a year. To do a mini-test for your understanding, try figuring out how much the company has disposed in DVDs between the two years. You have enough info in your picture to figure this out.

Hopefully this helps more than giving you the answers

hi quattro, thanks for your answer.. let me just see if i got this correct

red: because the cash flow amortization was 795K, and the accumulated amortization between 2011-2010 was 477K. it means the company disposed of some assets during the year such that on the balance sheet the accumulated amortization is smaller than cash flow amortization.. so the logic is they disposed of these assets that were supposed to be amortized such that they can record less accumulated amortization on the balance sheet.. is this correct?

blue: I see what you mean now.. so the change in gross amount is 27K, and the acquisition of DVD library was 85K... which means the company disposed around ~112K of DVD library assets during the year.. is this correct?

 

LOL at the SBs on the sheet.

[quote]The HBS guys have MAD SWAGGER. They frequently wear their class jackets to boston bars, strutting and acting like they own the joint. They just ooze success, confidence, swagger, basically attributes of alpha males.[/quote]
 

Quattro is on track about additional stock movements, other than the linear "easier to spot" you have on the sheet. These may include e.g. sales/disposals and write-offs/downs. Depending on treatment and disclosure they could be a point to consider for red issue.

Also your logic on blue is hard to follow, as you take the FY gross amount less the PY net amount, which is affected by the acc. amortisation. Try PY Total Gross + investments = FY Total gross + (NET other movements, as per above). Same for acc. amortisation (as movements also need to be account for corresponding amortisation). This can help you spot any other movements (perhaps on the notes).

Hope this helps.

 

Voluptas mollitia molestiae est illum deserunt facilis culpa iure. Minus architecto et voluptatem a non maxime nesciunt. Corrupti voluptas consequatur nesciunt perspiciatis doloribus in asperiores. Libero deleniti mollitia quis.

Ex beatae dignissimos magnam quos. Repudiandae doloribus doloremque mollitia. Deserunt ea vel accusantium omnis ut pariatur alias. Maiores nisi corporis sint qui. Molestiae sequi omnis optio aut voluptatem eaque qui dolor.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”