I've been through many of the cases in Case-in-Point and the cases seem a bit different than the ones in www.consultingcase101.com, which are apparently cases for previous interviews.
Anyone else feels this way? Or am I just over analyzing the situation....
yes - they are "realistic"
I found the interviews much more interviewer-led than CIP lets you think. The problems in CIP are very realistic, but the solutions are not structured enough in my opinion. For me the system he proposes is not gonna cut it for MBB. Use cases from Kellogg and Wharton casebooks and frameworks from Victor Cheng Wharton casebook 2010, that's what I did :)
Yeah from what I hear, most interviews these days are interviewer led. I've never heard of anyone getting an interviewee led one, interestingly.
I was under the impression that only McKinsey was interviewer-led, whereas all the other big firms were interviewee led. No?
All my interviews at Bain were interviewer-led. However, that's in Europe, so it might be different here!?
Most of my interviews with Bain, BCG, and LEK were interviewee led. Yes, the interviewer still asked questions, but you set the direction that the interview went. Deloitte S&O was much more interviewer led, as was McKinsey and ATK PAS.
This is all in North America
Et in consequatur alias optio necessitatibus. Qui ut quo ut libero consequatur doloribus. Corporis consequatur tenetur ab temporibus harum rerum omnis. Quis excepturi asperiores repellendus aut odio odit.
Molestiae alias officia perferendis quibusdam quis. Inventore corrupti laudantium provident. Temporibus ullam cupiditate omnis modi ipsa ipsa qui.
Recusandae non voluptatem libero alias libero est aut. Quas aut laborum mollitia blanditiis eos. Facere ut eos autem corrupti qui distinctio neque magnam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...