Bridgewater Associates vs. Chicago Prop Firm

I'm a young guy in interviews for an entry-level trading position with these two firms, and they seem completely different.

Bridgewater is offering a pure execution role, a high base salary, and a massive name that may be somewhat toxic. I think I'd enjoy the culture, but I could be wrong. I have more of a network in New York, but might be tempted by the commute to live out in CT.

The prop firm offers a much lower base salary, a smaller/less-well-known but still reputable name, possibly higher risk of getting axed for not making money, but probably more opportunity for advancement, more responsibility, and the chance to eventually develop my own strategies and earn a bigger bonus from them. Chicago is significantly cheaper, but I know very few people there, and no one in finance.

Things are going well in the interview processes for both of them, and I am trying to establish an order of preference here. If I only get one in the end, I will obviously take that one, but I want to figure out the better place to start for me personally.

Goals-wise, I'm not sure if I want to stay in trading "forever", try to transition to more of a hedge fund strategist/portfolio management role, or try to transition to something very different later down the line, but I do think I'd enjoy trading very much.

 
SYRYMFLASH:

Man, I would not even think about this and just GRAB Bridgewater Associates. My personal opinion.
In addition, I think people have more exit opps from a hedge fund rather than a prop trading firm.
I read millions of times that if someone screws up in prop trading, that person's life essentially screwed.
However, yeah if you succeed at prop trading, you can make tons of money right away.

I am not sure but I doubt good exit opps could come from a purely execution role either (even if it is at a large firm), compared to a prop position? What am I missing here

 
SYRYMFLASH:

I believe exit opps from HFs, in general, are better than prop trading. Everyone says that; however, as you mentioned exit opps are not great either.

HFs and Prop are the same essentially except for the source of the capital and pay outs.

Stop posting nonsense.

 
SYRYMFLASH:

Man, I would not even think about this and just GRAB Bridgewater Associates. My personal opinion.
In addition, I think people have more exit opps from a hedge fund rather than a prop trading firm.
I read millions of times that if someone screws up in prop trading, that person's life essentially screwed.
However, yeah if you succeed at prop trading, you can make tons of money right away.

Please don't listen to this kid. He/she just posted about BW being a dream place compared to IBs, AMs, and PE firms.
 
Best Response

Bear in mind that in an execution role at a hedge fund, you're probably not on track to move into research or become a PM. I'm not sure if that's something you're concerned about, but it's something to be aware of.

Bridgewater has a reputation of being a tough place to work. That said, I know nice people who've survived there for longer than a year.

Ray Dahlio is a bit of a kook. (Most rich people are kooks to be fair.)

Hedge funds have layoffs, too. I'd argue that while there are more layoffs at prop shops, the market covariance on layoffs is the same at a firm like Bridgewater as it is at a Jump or a DRW. So either way you're still getting laid off during the toughest times to get laid off.

I think Bridgewater wins here, but it's an 18 month hit and run. Get an MFin or MBA after you quit and go into a research role.

 

Expedita et qui laborum facere sunt hic. Consequatur adipisci consequatur dignissimos quasi. Doloremque facilis voluptatem odio ut aperiam. Nam fuga dicta numquam et excepturi reprehenderit. Omnis est est mollitia sint porro id sit et. Debitis aut corrupti quia fugiat.

Molestias vero omnis fuga odio. Laborum sint necessitatibus commodi optio dolores quas. Dolores incidunt reprehenderit necessitatibus eos aut. Facilis provident repellat fugiat aut odio. Nam quod quia dolorem dolorum voluptate sunt. Explicabo veritatis aliquam voluptatum laboriosam.

Vel quidem quae quibusdam alias autem. Necessitatibus ea blanditiis natus accusantium consequatur dolores. Odit aliquam animi quasi veritatis minima aut expedita.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”